[My] Life in Wisconsin

An infringement or an advance?


http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2009873854_medina16m.html


By Sonia Krishnan Seattle Times staff reporter

Medina facts:
Population (2009 estimate): 3,169
Median age: 45
Average household income: $222,290
Source: Claritas

City signs have a unique way of greeting people. In Issaquah, for instance, motorists are told they're entering "a special place where people care." For years, Bothell invited people to stay "for a day or a lifetime."

In Medina, a new sign bears this warning: "You Are Entering a 24 Hour Video Surveillance Area."

Cameras installed at Medina intersections monitor every vehicle coming into the city. The cameras capture all license-plate numbers, in a crime-prevention measure that one council member says "outweighs concern over privacy."

Cameras have recently been installed at intersections to monitor every vehicle coming into the city.

Under the "automatic license plate recognition" project, once a car enters Medina, a camera captures its license-plate number. Within seconds, the number is run through a database.

If a hit comes up for a felony — say, the vehicle was reported stolen or is being driven by a homicide suspect — the information is transmitted instantaneously to police, who can "leap into action," said Police Chief Jeffrey Chen.

"These cameras provide us with intelligence," Chen said. "It gets us in front of criminals. I don't like to be on a level playing field with criminals."

He declined to give the number and location of all the cameras.

Medina — a city of 3,100 with an average household income of $222,000 — had discussed the idea for years as a way to discourage crime, city officials said.

Last year, there were 11 burglaries, Chen said.

"Some people think [that number of burglaries] is tolerable," he said. "But even one crime is intolerable."

All captured information is stored for 60 days — even if nothing negative turns up, he said. That allows police to mine data if a crime occurs later, Chen said.

Doug Honig, spokesman for the American Civil Liberties Union of Washington, said such a system smacks of privacy violations.

"Government shouldn't be keeping records of people's comings and goings when they haven't done anything wrong," he said. "By actions like this, we're moving closer and closer to a surveillance society."

Medina City Councilmember Lucius Biglow said crime prevention "outweighs concern over privacy."

"Privacy is considerably less nowadays than it was, say, 50 years ago," he said. "I think most of us are pretty well-documented by the federal government ... simply because of the Internet and credit cards."

It's no secret cameras are everywhere — in stores, streets, parks and intersections where police want to cite drivers for running red lights.

A 2005 city survey showed that nearly a half of Medina's residents agreed with the camera installation. In 2007, the City Council unanimously approved moving forward. (A cost for the project was not immediately available Tuesday from city officials.)

The city looked to nearby Hunts Point as an example. The peninsula-shaped residential community just north of Medina has been using a video-camera setup to record a continuous loop of car traffic in and out of town for more than three years, town administrator Jack McKenzie said.

The town of about 500 residents hasn't had a single break-in since the cameras were installed. "I recommend it highly," McKenzie said.

He said visitors to Hunts Point can't miss the video equipment: "It's 12 feet tall and covered with cameras," he said of the installation, which is located at the traffic circle at the entrance to the community. There are eight cameras in all; pairs of cameras point in four directions.

No residents have ever complained about it, he said.

McKenzie said the town has used it for evidence in a couple of cases. In one case, he said, a woman driving a Mercedes ran into a mailbox pagoda, damaging the mailboxes and her car.

Medina police — who provide Hunts Point with police protection — reviewed the tape and picked out the undamaged Mercedes going into town, and the damaged car later coming out.

Medina City Council members say the cameras aren't about preserving a gated-community atmosphere.

"We're not elitist at all," Councilmember Robert Rudolph said. "There is a mix of people in Medina of all economic strata. What we're doing here is protecting our citizenry."

Sonia Krishnan: 206-515-5546 or skrishnan@seattletimes.com. Staff reporter Katherine Long and news researcher Gene Balk contributed to this report.

********

My own ideas on this is, if you have nothing to hide, then it should not be a problem. I further believe that this could be a major assist to law enforcement, not having to track down all the shop cameras on businesses etc.

What are your thoughts? If you lived here, would you feel safer or would you feel paranoid?


XOXO
me

13 comments:

  1. Well at least they are being obvious about their tracking people. There isn't anyplace that you go where the government can't or doesn't know about you. Especially if you own and use a cell phone

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have mixed feelings about it. My inner flower child of the 70s is saying: "Hell no! Nobody has the the right to invade my privacy like that." But the grown up adult in me is saying: "As long as it helps fight crime, I have no problem with it."

    I live in what's considered to be a small town (25000-30000) and believe me they don't need surveillance cameras to know what everyone's up to - they have it covered - by gossip alone!

    What I found amazing was the median income of Medina is $222,000!! What kind of industry, or businesses, in a town of 3169, would pay people that kind of money? I'm off to Google Medina!

    ReplyDelete


  3. I believe this is where Bill Gates lives?

    Not sure

    ReplyDelete
  4. Birds of a feather...

    I found that most are employed in technical, scientific and financial industries. Median priced home is Well over a million.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think that if the citizens are ok with it then it is none of my business.

    If they can video tape you in every store and whatever you are in then there should be no issue. If you got something to hide, don't go there.


    I wonder how many people would "cheat" in bars if they knew that almost ALL bars have video cameras.

    ReplyDelete
  6. and FYI, in a small town gossip is better than any camera. My town is not so small 45,000 or so but not one person comes into my neighborhood that everyone doesn't know about.

    Everyone knows who belongs here and if you don't expect to be noticed. This is why even though taggers and gangs from the next city over roam nearby they NEVER come to this neighborhood.

    They would be (and have) been noticed by someone and promptly escorted away by the police. Much like the random recycle pillagers. If they are neat and clean up, no one says much but if they leave so much as a paper on the ground they are warned ONCE the second time, they get the police escort (it is illegal here to steal recycle).

    ReplyDelete
  7. I heard about this on the news not too long ago...

    I don't think there is anything wrong with it... The residents who live there seem to have no problem with it...

    Nowadays, you are on camera EVERYWHERE you go anyway, so what's the difference? If this community feels the need to have this type of surveillance (AND it's wealthy enough to PAY for it) let them have it if it will make them feel safer...

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm for it in public places. Hell, I am for it in private residences if they choose to do so.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I dont have an issue with it.. maybe if a criminal knows hes on camera he might be less likely to commit the crime.

    Its like locks on doors..... you may trust your neighbors but you still lock the door when you leave or at bedtime.

    ReplyDelete
  10. oh and btw.. there is no privacy in this world today. Its pathetic but for about 20 bucks you can find out anything about anyone.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Well darn...the cameras don't bother me in the least. I've always adapted to the idea that if you aren't doing anything wrong then the cameras don't matter. And if I am I may as well fess up and get it over with. No sense in lying. Even if a camera didn't catch me, I know and God knows and that would be all it would take for me to crack! lol!

    What I am impressed with is this "average" income in Medina!

    ReplyDelete