[My] Life in Wisconsin

Pea Cheese. Blog? Tag!

It is time for a little tag...  hehehe
NOW we're having fun!

XOXO
Me

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1. How tall are you barefoot? 5' 9" (and a quarter).

3. Do you own a gun? You bet your bippy I do! More than one. (AND I even know how to use them)!

4. Rehab? No

5. Do you get nervous before “meeting the parents”? Only my own. (See 'about me' on my top page).

6. What do you think of your friends? If I didn't like them they wouldn't be my friends- (What the hell kind of question is this anyway)???

7. What’s your favorite Christmas song? "Jump"

8. What do you prefer to drink in the morning? Whiskey

9. Do you do push-ups? Yes, but I prefer popsicles or drumsticks

10. Do you wet your toothbrush before pasting it or vice versa? Sometimes...

11. Are you vegetarian? NO WAY Meat Head.

13. What is your secret weapon to lure in the opposite sex? Must have lost mine somewhere...

14. Do you own a knife? I eat my peas with honey; I've done this all my life. (I know it may sound funny, but it keeps them on my knife)!

15. Do you have A.D.D.? Wanna ride bikes?

16. Date Of Birth? Adopted... Does anyone ever tell the truth? (I think I am about 32).

17. Top 3 thoughts at this exact moment: Who comes up with these? Do you want fries with that? Why does my dryer keep making that noise?

18. Name the last 3 things you have bought? No

20. What time did you wake up today? 3am, 7:30 am

21. Current hair? Needs shaving, or quilling, or something/ANYthing

22. Current worry? Sheesh, I drink too much whiskey to worry about anything

23. Current hate? Knees and Politicians

24. Favorite place to be? In a cavern, in a canyon, excavating for a mine...

25. Least favorite place to be? Caught.

26. Where would you like to go? Where ever the dogs go.

27. Do you own slippers? This is Wisconsin. We either own slippers or wear snowmobile boots to bed.

28. What do you think you’ll be in 10 yrs? Where the dogs are. (Pay attention).

29. Do you burn or tan? Depends what I am cooking...

30. Last thing you ate? Vegetarian fried eggs

31. Would you be a pirate? I already am! ~~~Calico Anne Kidd...  "Often indecisive, I can't even choose a favorite color. I'm apt to follow wherever the wind blows me, just like Calico Jack Rackham, my namesake. Even though I'm not always the traditional swaggering gallant, my steadiness and planning make me a fine, reliable pirate."   Arrrrr Maties!

32. Last time you had an alcoholic drink? Yesterday

33. What songs do you sing in the shower? Same ones I sing in the bathtub

34. What did you fear was going to get you at night as a child? My teddy bear.

36. Last thing that made you laugh? I do not laugh.

37. Best bed sheets you had as a child? Dry ones.

38. Worst injury you’ve ever had? I fell on my head. (Yesterday).

40. How many TVs do you have in your house? Taking inventory? Or casing the joint?

41. Who is your loudest friend? Punk.

42. Who is your most silent friend? The Slurkers.

43. Does someone have a crush on you? Radar O'Reilly? Grape? (Or was that Nehi)?

44. Do you wish on stars? I said I was tall. I am not THAT tall.

45. What is your favorite book? The dictionary

46. What is your favorite candy? Sour hard balls

47. What song do/did you want played at your wedding? Amazing Grace

48. What song do you want played at your funeral? "Somebody's Watching Me"

49. What were you doing 12AM last night? Target practice

50. Do you love someone? Now that I can dance...

(Now where in the heck is #2)?!?

Hmm???  
OK...

  • If you don't want to tag back and answer the questions,
    I s'pose y'all could come up with a #2 for me...





Is it time for blog cheese?

Detroit...(or Maury Povich)?

Rating:
Category:Other
Hi All;
I might be giggling, but I cannot find it within myself to be giving this 5~Stars.

(Unless they are for the Laugh~Factor)...

********

The following are all replies that Detroit women have written on Child Support Agency Forms in the section for listing 'father's details'...
They are genuine excerpts from the forms.


reviews[1]
1. Regarding the identity of the father of my twins, Makeeshia was fathered by Maclearndon McKinley. I am unsure as to the identity of the father of Marlinda, but I believe that she was conceived on the same night.


reviews[1]
2. I am unsure, as to the identity of the father of my child, as I was being sick out of a window when taken unexpectedly from behind. I can provide you with a list of names of men that I think were at the party if this helps.


reviews[1]
3. I do not know the name of the father of my little girl. She was conceived at a party at 3600 East Grand Boulevard where I had sex with a man I met that night.. I do remember that the sex was so good that I fainted. If you do manage to track down the father, can you please send me his phone number? Thanks.



reviews[1]
4. I don't know the identity of the father of my daughter. He drives a BMW that now has a hole made by my stiletto in one of the door panels. Perhaps you can contact BMW service stations in this area and see f he's had it replaced.


reviews[1]
5. I have never had sex with a man. I am still a Virginian. I am awaiting a letter from the Pope confirming that my son's conception was ejaculate and that he is the Saver risen again.


reviews[1]
6. I cannot tell you the name of Alleshia dad as he Informs me that to do so would blow his cover and that would have cataclysmic implications for the economy. I am torn between doing right by you and right by the country. Please advise.


reviews[1]
7. I do not know who the father of my child was as they all look the same to me .


reviews[1]
8. Tyrone Hairston is the father of child A. If you do catch up with him, can you ask him what he did with my AC/DC CDs? Child B who was also borned at the same time.....well, I don't have clue.


reviews[1]
9. From the dates it seems that my daughter was Conceived at Disney World; maybe it really is the Magic Kingdom .


reviews[1]
10. So much about that night is a blur. The only Thing that I remember for sure is Delia Smith did a program about eggs earlier in the evening. If I had stayed at The party at 8956 Miller Ave , mine might have remained unfertilized.


reviews[1]
11.. I am unsure as to the identity of the father of my baby, after all, like when you eat a can of beans you can't be sure which one made you fart.


*************




[Town Hall] Harassment Strategy Detailed In Memo

"Iron sharpens iron; scholar, the scholar."

My own thoughts are
Some people simply cannot be taught


**************************


Right-Wing Harassment Strategy Against Dems Detailed In Memo: ‘Yell,’ ‘Stand Up And Shout Out,’ ‘Rattle Him’

This morning, Politico reported that Democratic members of Congress are increasingly being harassed by “angry, sign-carrying mobs and disruptive behavior” at local town halls. For example, in one incident, right-wing protesters surrounded Rep. Tim Bishop (D-NY) and forced police officers to have to escort him to his car for safety.

This growing phenomenon is often marked by violence and absurdity. Recently, right-wing demonstrators hung Rep. Frank Kratovil (D-MD) in effigy outside of his office. Missing from the reporting of these stories is the fact that much of these protests are coordinated by public relations firms and lobbyists who have a stake in opposing President Obama’s reforms.

The lobbyist-run groups Americans for Prosperity and FreedomWorks, which orchestrated the anti-Obama tea parties earlier this year, are now pursuing an aggressive strategy to create an image of mass public opposition to health care and clean energy reform. A leaked memo from Bob MacGuffie, a volunteer with the FreedomWorks website Tea Party Patriots, details how members should be infiltrating town halls and harassing Democratic members of Congress:

Tea Bagger Memo

    – Artificially Inflate Your Numbers: “Spread out in the hall and try to be in the front half. The objective is to put the Rep on the defensive with your questions and follow-up. The Rep should be made to feel that a majority, and if not, a significant portion of at least the audience, opposes the socialist agenda of Washington.”

    – Be Disruptive Early And Often: “You need to rock-the-boat early in the Rep’s presentation, Watch for an opportunity to yell out and challenge the Rep’s statements early.”

    – Try To “Rattle Him,” Not Have An Intelligent Debate: “The goal is to rattle him, get him off his prepared script and agenda. If he says something outrageous, stand up and shout out and sit right back down. Look for these opportunities before he even takes questions.”

The memo above also resembles the talking points being distributed by FreedomWorks for pushing an anti-health reform assault all summer. Patients United, a front group maintained by Americans for Prosperity, is currently busing people all over the country for more protests against Democratic members. Rep. Pete Sessions (R-TX), chairman of the NRCC, has endorsed the strategy, telling the Politico the days of civil town halls are now “over.”

Meanwhile, AHIP, the trade group and lobbying juggernaut representing the health insurance industry is sending staffers to monitor town halls and other right-wing front groups are stepping up their ad campaign to smear reform efforts. The strategy for defeating reform — recently outlined by an influential lobbyist to the Hill newspaper as “delay” then “kill” — is becoming apparent. By delaying a vote until after the August recess, lobbyists are now seizing upon recess town halls as opportunities to ambush lawmakers and fool them into believing there is wide opposition to reform.


Update
Amy Menefee, communications director of Americans for Prosperity and its anti-health reform group Patients United, wrote to ThinkProgress regarding this post:

 "Several blogs have picked up your post: http://thinkprogress.org/ which mentions Americans for Prosperity's efforts next to your mention of Bob MacGuffie's memo about town hall meetings. Mr. MacGuffie's memo was his own work.  I would appreciate your help in correcting the erroneous rumor people have passed around that this memo came from AFP. We have encouraged our members to attend town halls, ask questions and register their opinions about issues including health care -- as all citizens should do. We always promote civil dialogue and do not condone disruptive behavior."



*** If you have made it this far, please pay attention to the authors response to the above note.


RESPONSE.
"As noted in the post, MacGuffie is a volunteer who actively posts and volunteers with the website Tea Party Patriots.

  • A review of the sponsoring organizations reveals that both FreedomWorks and Americans for Prosperity are sponsors of the website as "Freedom Coalition" partners.

  • A few months before joining Americans for Prosperity, Menefee herself worked for the medical device/pharmaceutical industry-funded "think-tank" called the Galen Institute. end quote...


    Of course she did. Go figure.


    XOXO
    Me


**************************


Entire Town Hall Memo "Rocking the Town Halls---Best Practices" can be found here. CLICK HERE (or directly below).
http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/townhallactionmemo.pdf

**************************





SICK HEIL: RACIAL PARANOIA, WHITE VICTIMOLOGY AND THE HITLERIZING OF OBAMA -by Tim Wise


Good Afternoon!
Yes, I have Mr. Wise express permission to reprint this within my blog.
XOXO
Anne
********

********


by Tim Wise August 12, 2009, 1:23 pm
Tim Wise is the author of four books on race.   His latest is, Between Barack and a Hard Place: Racism and White Denial in the Age of Obama (City Lights, 2009).  

http://www.redroom.com/author/tim-wise/

If you get a chance, today or perhaps tomorrow, do yourself a favor. Look up some file footage, perhaps on YouTube, of Adolf Hitler, addressing his followers. I know, it doesn't sound like the best way to spend your day, or even a few minutes of it, but trust me, there's a point to the recommendation. While you watch, notice the unhinged shouting, the wild eyes, the veins on his neck, the psychotic bodily gesticulations. Then, take a look at footage from yesterday's town hall meeting, called by President Obama in New Hampshire, in which he sought to lay out his case for health care reform to an audience that included supporters and opponents of his plan. Notice: no shouting, no wild eyes, no bulging jugular vein, no apparent sociopathy whatsoever. Indeed notice as the President actually seeks out questions from people who disagree with him, and then thanks them for making good points and raising legitimate concerns, even when the premises of their questions are dead wrong, and largely originated in crazy town.

Then ask yourself, is this the man that much of right-wing talk radio would have us believe is a Nazi? The political reincarnation of Hitler--ya know, the lunatic I asked you to watch first? Really? Really? Wow. Sometimes, it's hard to know where to begin.

On the one hand, the comparisons seem literally bat-shit insane. Especially when considering that at the same time folks are comparing Obama to the world's most infamous right-wing fascist, they are at the same time calling him a Marxist, and a left-wing radical. Oh sure, they try and say that Hitler was really a leftist, ya know, because the Nazis were National Socialists. Of course. And hot dogs are made from puppies.

Anyway, it seems at first blush to make no sense. Any reading of the Nazi era makes it all too clear how far afield from the Third Reich the Obama administration is. After coming to power, the Nazis moved to outlaw all opposition parties, suspend the nation's constitution, round up and detain their political adversaries (or better yet, kill them), and destroy the trade unions. All this, well before initiating the murderous campaigns against Jews, Romany, homosexuals and others deemed "life unworthy of life." Needless to say, Obama has done none of this, has proposed none of this, and only the most truly unstable person could really believe such things were just around the corner. Although there are such persons to be found in the body politic, such as Ron Paul acolytes, Ayn Rand devotees and real estate agent/dentist/professional whack-a-doodle, Orly Taitz, surely even the most cynical would have to agree that the numbers of persons who seem to buy into this rhetoric far and away exceed the likely national percentages of the truly mentally ill.

And those propagating the comparisons--the Limbaughs and Becks and Savages, and Hannitys (who have the top four radio talk shows in the nation right now)--despite their fervent commitment to right-wing ideas, surely cannot believe that an American Reich is on the horizon. In short, they can't possibly be serious.

So why then, do they keep saying it? It is this question that I've been pondering for the past few days. What could possibly be the purpose of making an argument that has so little intellectual validity; so little indeed that it can be easily shot down by the average 12th grade European history student (who, it should be noted, would have as much education as either Limbaugh or Hannity)? What would be the value, symbolically speaking, of putting forth on protest signs this Obama=Hitler meme, and visually representing that meme, straight down to the little mustache, side-swept hairdo and swastika adornment?

And then it struck me. This analogy, as absurd as it is factually, and as offensive as it is historically, makes almost perfect sense politically, to a movement that is trying desperately to create a groundswell of support behind the notion that white people are the new victims of massive discrimination, the new victims of the Obama era: the ones who don't get picked first for the Supreme Court, and who can no longer take for granted their hegemonic power. And that is precisely the kind of movement they are trying to build, what with their equally facile rantings that white men, according to Limbaugh, are being sent to the "back of the bus" under Obama, because he literally hates white people, and that white men are now experiencing, to hear Pat Buchanan tell it, "exactly what black folks" experienced during the days of Jim Crow. Within a politics of white resentment and white victimology, the Hitler meme works. After all, Hitler was not just a fascist, but is understood to have been a racial fascist: one whose dictatorial and murderous schemes were directed at a distinctly racialized "other." So to make the black man atop the U.S. political system into Hitler, is to plant the idea in white minds that he too will be a racial fascist. And if that is the case, the question is quite obviously begged, which race will he be coming for? Ah yes, white man, see? Now are you scared?

By playing upon white fears--fears of a black President with a funny name, fears of a country that within about 30 years will no longer be majority white, fears of the inability to take for granted that our Leave-it-to-Beaver, Norman Rockwell, Boy Scout-approved national narrative will continue to predominate--the right hopes to prove resurgent, and the GOP hopes to remain a living entity. They have all but abandoned any hopes of attracting large numbers of people of color. The writing in that regard is on the wall and they seem to very much know it. So they have retreated into the laager--South African imagery very much intended here--and decided to go all in as the party of nostalgia, a white nationalist party, in effect, whose only hope is to claim that the nation has lost its greatness, and that everything that made America, well, America (ya know, back in the days of segregation) has been lost. And that such a transformation, from a formal white supremacist state, to a multicultural society, is of course a bad thing.

In addition to rallying the troops of white backlash, the Obama/Hitler analogies also serve another function, one that would be immediately recognizable to most any psychologist. That function is called projection: when someone recognizes a trait within themselves, and then, ashamed of that trait seeks it out in others and locates it there, displacing the shame and self-hatred that might otherwise manifest onto someone else.

For these right-wing louts to accuse President Obama of being a racist, let alone a potentially genocidal one at that, is the ultimate in projection. After all, it is the right whose authors regularly publish books with hateful and prejudicial comments about racialized others, not Obama, whose own writing reveals a deep and abiding love for his family--all of it, including the white half.

It is the right that channels Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebells, every time they spew lies about the health care bill's euthanasia provisions, or about how Obama is going to confiscate all the guns, or casting doubt on Obama's citizenship, or about how Mexicans are looking to "reconquer" the American southwest, or about how illegal immigrants are a major source of leprosy and disease. All of these things have been debunked, time and again, and yet they are repeated daily, as if facts don't matter. Because to anti-intellectual brownshirts, they don't.

It is the right channeling the thuggishness of the Nazi bullies by sending folks to public forums to shout and disrupt, and to intimidate people by carrying weapons.

It is the right that would like to smash the trade unions.

It is the right that stood by while the last president circumvented the Constitution on such matters as wiretaps, torture, the primacy of international treaties to which the U.S. is a party, and the suspension of habeas corpus for suspected "terrorists."

It is folks like Michael Savage--perhaps the most truly psychotic of the right-wing radio set--who has staked out positions of overt racism and even murderous intent. To wit, his comments of May 11 and 12, 2004, to the effect that Arab Muslims are "non humans," who should be either forcibly converted to Christianity or slaughtered. Or his statement of April 17, 2006, to the effect that the United States should kill 100 million Muslims. Or his more recent comment to the effect that he hopes "far extreme, violent motorcycle gangs" show up at the health care town hall meetings around the country. Or his statement about liberal advocacy groups, suggesting "they have no place in America," and that he would like to "round up every member of the ACLU and of the National Lawyers Guild and...put them in a prison in Guantanamo and...throw the key away" Or his pithy paraphrasing of a statement previously made by Nazi leader Hermann Goering, to the effect that when he "hears that someone is in the civil rights business," he "oils up (his) AR-15," and presumably not so as to have an intelligent conversation.

And speaking of Nazis, it was Pat Buchanan who said, in a 1977 column that the early Adolf Hitler--the one who suspended civil liberties, murdered his political opponents inside Germany, and set about to invade surrounding countries so as to broaden the boundaries of the Reich--was for all intent and purposes, a model leader. Prior to initiating the Holocaust of European Jewry, Hitler seems to have done little with which Buchanan could find fault, thus his claim: "If Hitler had died in 1937 on the fourth anniversary of his coming to power, he would undoubtedly have gone down as one of the greatest figures of German history." Hitler was, to hear Pat tell it, "an individual of great courage, a soldier's soldier in the Great War, a political organizer of the first rank" whose "genius" was in having such an "intuitive sense of the mushiness, the character flaws, the weakness masquerading as morality that was in the hearts of the statesmen who stood in his path."

Yet Pat Buchanan, who also called for the U.S. to annex parts of Canada back in a 1989 column, so as to expand the size of our nation's "white tribe"--an idea that Herr Hitler would have no doubt found exhilarating--remains a commentator in good standing on major networks. And so the right, which regularly espouses ideas resonant of the very fascism they would ascribe to Obama, gets a free pass, as they project their own darkest authoritarian desires onto others, with whom they cannot intellectually compete. And so they must bully. They must shout. They must drown out reason with volume.

And beneath it all, they hope that just enough people will listen. Just enough to build a movement rooted in white anger, white fear, white victimology, and the reassertion of white nationhood that they feel has been taken from them.

The question is--and it may be the only one that matters right now--what are we going to do about it, and by "we" I mean especially those of us called white? Are we going to let the hateful throngs define us, for us? Are we going to sit back while they seek to organize a politics of racial backlash in our name? Are we going to merely laugh at them and then move on, figuring that the threat they pose is minimal? Or will we stand up, demand that there are other ways to live in this skin, and choose to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with our black and brown brothers and sisters who are, as they have long been, under such attack in this nation? Will we choose the road of antagonism or allyship?

Make no mistake, the future of the country may very well depend on how we answer.


Thank you Mr Wise.

The Pledge of Allegiance - A Short History


http://oldtimeislands.org/pledge/pledge.htm
The Pledge of Allegiance
A Short History
by Dr. John W. Baer

Copyright 1992 by Dr. John W. Baer
A Revised History and Analysis, 2007 by Dr. John W. Baer.
Copyright 2007 by John W. Baer



Francis Bellamy (1855 - 1931), a Baptist minister, wrote the original Pledge in August 1892. He was a Christian Socialist. In his Pledge, he is expressing the ideas of his first cousin, Edward Bellamy, author of the American socialist utopian novels, Looking Backward (1888) and Equality (1897).

..................................................................................................................................... Illustration by Roxanna Baer.

Francis Bellamy in his sermons and lectures and Edward Bellamy in his novels and articles described in detail how the middle class could create a planned economy with political, social and economic equality for all. The government would run a peace time economy similar to our present military industrial complex.

The Pledge was published in the September 8th issue of The Youth's Companion, the leading family magazine and the Reader's Digest of its day. Its owner and editor, Daniel Ford, had hired Francis in 1891 as his assistant when Francis was pressured into leaving his baptist church in Boston because of his socialist sermons. As a member of his congregation, Ford had enjoyed Francis's sermons. Ford later founded the liberal and often controversial Ford Hall Forum, located in downtown Boston.

In 1892 Francis Bellamy was also a chairman of a committee of state superintendents of education in the National Education Association. As its chairman, he prepared the program for the public schools' quadricentennial celebration for Columbus Day in 1892. He structured this public school program around a flag raising ceremony and a flag salute - his 'Pledge of Allegiance.'

His original Pledge read as follows: 'I pledge allegiance to my Flag and (to*) the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.' He considered placing the word, 'equality,' in his Pledge, but knew that the state superintendents of education on his committee were against equality for women and African Americans. [ * 'to' added in October, 1892. ]

Dr. Mortimer Adler, American philosopher and last living founder of the Great Books program at Saint John's College, has analyzed these ideas in his book, The Six Great Ideas. He argues that the three great ideas of the American political tradition are 'equality, liberty and justice for all.' 'Justice' mediates between the often conflicting goals of 'liberty' and 'equality.'

In 1923 and 1924 the National Flag Conference, under the 'leadership of the American Legion and the Daughters of the American Revolution, changed the Pledge's words, 'my Flag,' to 'the Flag of the United States of America.' Bellamy disliked this change, but his protest was ignored.

In 1954, Congress after a campaign by the Knights of Columbus, added the words, 'under God,' to the Pledge. The Pledge was now both a patriotic oath and a public prayer.

Bellamy's granddaughter said he also would have resented this second change. He had been pressured into leaving his church in 1891 because of his socialist sermons. In his retirement in Florida, he stopped attending church because he disliked the racial bigotry he found there.

What follows is Bellamy's own account of some of the thoughts that went through his mind in August, 1892, as he picked the words of his Pledge:

It began as an intensive communing with salient points of our national history, from the Declaration of Independence onwards; with the makings of the Constitution...with the meaning of the Civil War; with the aspiration of the people...

The true reason for allegiance to the Flag is the 'republic for which it stands.' ...And what does that vast thing, the Republic mean? It is the concise political word for the Nation - the One Nation which the Civil War was fought to prove. To make that One Nation idea clear, we must specify that it is indivisible, as Webster and Lincoln used to repeat in their great speeches. And its future?

Just here arose the temptation of the historic slogan of the French Revolution which meant so much to Jefferson and his friends, 'Liberty, equality, fraternity.' No, that would be too fanciful, too many thousands of years off in realization. But we as a nation do stand square on the doctrine of liberty and justice for all...

If the Pledge's historical pattern repeats, its words will be modified during this decade. Below are two possible changes.

Some prolife advocates recite the following slightly revised Pledge: 'I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all, born and unborn.'

A few liberals recite a slightly revised version of Bellamy's original Pledge: 'I pledge allegiance to my Flag, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with equality, liberty and justice for all.'

Bibliography:

Baer, John. The Pledge of Allegiance, A Revised History and Analysis, 2007, Annapolis, Md. Free State Press, Inc., 2007. Available on Amazon.com.
Miller, Margarette S. Twenty-Three Words, Portsmouth, Va. Printcraft Press, 1976.

For more information about the history of the Pledge, be sure to also read the other online chapters of The Pledge of Allegiance, A Revised History and Analysis, 2007 by Dr. Baer:

o The Youth's Companion's Pledge
http://oldtimeislands.org/pledge/pdgech2.htm

o American Socialists and Reformers
http://oldtimeislands.org/pledge/pdgech3.htm



Do you have other questions or comments about the "short history" or about the chapters shown above?
Please contact:
Dr. John W. Baer
10 Taney Ave.
Annapolis, MD 21401
(410) 268 - 1743

Flintville's Very Own "Garden of Weeden"


I am sure we have all read this one...
I received it in my email, along with a message that I was doing good work, and to "keep up the good work"...


One day, the father of a very wealthy family took his son on a trip to the country with the express purpose of showing him how poor people live.
They spent a couple of days and nights on the farm of what would be considered a very poor family.

On their return from their trip, the father asked his son, 'How was the trip?'
'It was great, Dad.'
'Did you see how poor people live?' the father asked.
'Oh yeah,' said the son.

'So, tell me, what did you learn from the trip?' asked the father.
The son answered:

    * I saw that we have one dog and they had four..
    * We have a pool that reaches to the middle of our garden and they have a creek that has no end..
    * We have imported lanterns in our garden and they have the stars at night.
    * Our patio reaches to the front yard and they have the whole horizon.
    * We have a small piece of land to live on and they have fields that go beyond our sight.
    * We have servants who serve us, but they serve others.
    * We buy our food, but they grow theirs.
    * We have walls around our property to protect us, they have friends to protect them.'

The boy's father was speechless.
Then his son added , 'Thanks Dad for showing me how poor we are.'
.
.
.
.



.
.
.
Good Afternoon Everyone;
The above picture representing still another thing I should probably not have been doing. (Not that I did much, but carry things back and forth), to build up that pile...

At about 6:30 yesterday morning, as I was changing, I heard a tractor.  never knowing if this represents my hope that the neglected fields will be finally tended to; or something else, I had to take a peek. (It was "something else"). hehehe
Neighbor Greg had his tractor and mower out there to take down some noxious growth around the fields.  He had already called work and told them he would be there by nine, so he was up early and working hard.

He offered to dispense with my "Garden of Weeden".
I happily accepted, but warned him that there were old 2 box springs out there, under those weeds. We had burned them last Fall, so all that remained was the spring apparatus within.
When Spring came and the workers came to the field, Kelli had dragged them to the garden, knowing that I was not going to be planting one this year
.

So yesterday, we found one, and he pulled it free of its overgrowth.
We both searched for the other to no avail. Smiling, he said, "IOh, I'll find it", (as he pointed to his pull behind mower).

He sure did! And it shut the whole shebang down.
Thinking he could untwist and unwind it, he crawled under there. A few moments later, after freeing up most of it, he grabbed a large stick of wood from the woodpile by the grill.
And he began to pound... And pound. At that point, I'd come in and brought out a few hammers, and a few pliers and screwdrivers and a tin snips too.

Soon, all but one little piece of wire had been freed.
Wire, mind you, about an inch long, and about the width of a coat hanger.
And it was in-between the blade mechanisms and the deck.
Stuck.
No amount of leverage by screwdriver, or strength by pounding would free it.

Coffee break...

He backed it up under the willow then- Too late for him to be dry-  (The lawns all covered still with 60 degree dew). 
I too was wet- my shoes making that slursh~sloopie~ing noise as I walked. And clear up to my knees.
But unlike Greg, I had not been laying on the wet grass either.

We finally called Jim, (next door)- Greg drove it up there and was back mowing within about 20 minutes.  (About the time it had taken me to get redressed).
Enough excitement for one morning...

Casey came out... (She is now up to 101 pounds)!  YAY!
.
.
.

 CaseyFace
She is currently at UWGB, getting her Student ID
Say "YAY!!!"
.
.
At any rate, when she came yesterday, she had stopped at CVS, bringing my new meds with her.  (Which was a very good thing- since I had taken my last one at about 2 in the morning).

My appointment with the pain doctor went well. I will be receiving 2 injections in two different places in my back on the 8th. (I am not looking forward to those, by the way).
First up, I will be having an MRI at St. Marys Hospital next Friday.

Having one
heck of a time writing last night, ("finners" and brain not connecting right), I received this reply...
 "I take it the meds mixed with your dial up were too much for a blog?  Yup.

 

As Dr. Mario saw my xrays from this year and two years ago, he saw 4 or 5 bone spurs that definitely need attention too... (I would say so)!  So to keep my appointment mid next month with the "Spine"ologist.
Results from the MRI will then be in both places. (I love the digitized and shared capabilities of most hospitals and clinics)!

But we did stop at our own clinic before seeing him... Casey went in to pick up my xrays.
Punk and I played a bit of fetch.
.
.
Cnv1035 
Looking East
.
.
.
Cnv1036
And toward the North
.
.
.
Just before Casey came back outside we had gotten back in the car...

Punk dropped her ball...
.
.
Cnv1037 
Oops.
So the "I" fetched too!
hehehe
.
.
Later on, Casey, Kelli and Michelle packed up Miss Nadia, (one of Michelle's horses), and Miss Breezie and May, to go over to The Folkman's. Alan trims hooves.
I will leave Casey to put the rest of the pics on her blog... But just wanted to show you a few pics of the equipment involved.
.
.
Cnv1039 
.
.
And the worried look on Miss Mays face!
.
.
Cnv1045
hehehe
.
.
Walking outside with Punk the other morning-

...To be greeted by my Orange Blossom Bush-

.
.
.
Cnv0991 
Which has morphed into a Morning Glory for now!
.
.

I got to thinking about all the weeds in my pictures. 

Then I realized I would very much rather look at them than this...
.
.

.
.
Cnv1047 
Yes, I already know that Daddy-Long-Legs are very beneficial.
They are also the ONLY spider I can stand to be near.
.
.
.
Even so...  I would still rather look at my weeds.
.
.
Cnv1048 
.
.


So there you have it! Another exciting rendition of my week so far.

Hoping you all have a "wunnaful" weekend!

XOXO
Me


Inaccurate Health Care Info? Send those emails and e~addresses and links on! "There is a lot of disinformation about health insurance reform out there. Since we can't keep track of all of them here at the White House, we're asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to FLAG@WHITEHOUSE.GOV ****** A bit Orwellian, but it is time to get rid of the BS. XOXO, Me

Five right-wing myths about healthcare reform, and the facts...


http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2009/08/06/healthcare/print.html
Good Morning;
Here are a few more "goodies" for the uninformed...

PLEASE click the link above to read the whole story and to be able to bring up "more" on it all.

XOXO
Me

*************************



Turning America socialist apparently wasn't enough for him -- now President Obama is trying to make old people kill themselves, callously deny important medical procedures, funnel tax dollars to abortion clinics and wiggle the government's way into every doctor's office in America.

At least, that's the sense you might have about the healthcare reform proposals Congress is considering from listening to opponents describe them. Already, conservative activists have erupted against the plan, with protesters hanging Democratic lawmakers in effigy and disrupting town hall meetings.

Here's a fact check of some of the more alarming claims that the right is making about healthcare reform, claims that are already hardening into myth.



Myth 1: Democrats want to kill your grandmother. This claim seems too outlandish on its face to get much traction, but Republicans actually made some headway on it recently. Two House GOP leaders put out a statement warning that the healthcare reform bill "may start us down a treacherous path toward government-encouraged euthanasia." To hear opponents of reform talk about it, the legislation would force seniors to go in for sessions once every five years -- and more frequently if they're sick -- where doctors will encourage them to end their lives. Rep. Virginia Foxx, R-N.C., summarized the scare tactic pretty well on the House floor last week, when she said the bill would "put seniors in a position of being put to death by their government," and therefore, wouldn't be pro-life. The GOP has pushed this line especially hard with some of the conservative groups behind the government's intervention in the Terri Schiavo case a few years ago, hoping to get antiabortion allies on board fighting reform. "Can you imagine the response of the American people when they find this out?" one-time GOP presidential candidate Fred Thompson asked about the alleged euthanasia scheme on his radio show last month. "They're going to counsel you on preparing you to die," Rush Limbaugh pronounced a few weeks ago. Proof of how far this attack has spread came last week, when a caller to an AARP forum asked Obama about it directly. (Probably unwisely, the president tried to make light of the question, saying there weren't enough government employees to go meet with old people to talk about end-of-life care.)

There is a kernel of truth at the root of this attack: The legislation would order Medicare to pay for consultations between patients and doctors on end-of-life decisions, which it currently doesn't cover. But the consultations wouldn't be mandatory; if your grandmother doesn't want to go talk to her doctor about end-of-life care, she won't have to. Because Medicare doesn't pay for this kind of planning now, only 40 percent of seniors who depend on the government insurance say they have an advance directive that tells healthcare providers what measures they do and don't want used to prolong their life, even though 75 percent say they think it's important. The lack of planning actually costs a lot of money. Medicare spends billions and billions of dollars annually on expensive treatment during the last year of a dying patient's life. Without allowing Medicare to pay for end-of-life consultations, it's hard to know whether patients even want to go to such expensive lengths.



Myth 2: The government -- i.e., you -- will have to pay for abortions. This is another way the GOP is stirring up antiabortion activists against healthcare reform -- by warning that your tax dollars will be used to pay for someone else's abortion. An ad by the Family Research Council dramatizes the issue about as creepily as possible. "To think that Planned Parenthood is included in the government-run healthcare plan and spending tax dollars on abortions," a distraught older man tells his wife, sitting at their kitchen table after opening a letter from the government. "They won't pay for my surgery, but we're forced to pay abortions." The narrator lays out what's going on: "Our greatest generation denied care, our future generations denied life." A House Republican aide says the GOP thinks this could be the most potent type of viral attack against reform, since antiabortion Democrats will have trouble voting for the legislation if it includes taxpayer funding for the procedure.

But only the most extreme antiabortion reading of the legislation would say it does that. The words "Planned Parenthood" and "abortion" don't appear anywhere in the text, despite conservative buzz that it would funnel millions of dollars to killing babies. (A proposal in the Senate version of the reform legislation would require insurance plans to cover preventive care and screening visits to community health providers, which could include Planned Parenthood.) Even an AP story that Matt Drudge was hyping on Wednesday as proof that the government would be funding abortions didn't go quite that far -- instead, the story detailed a fight over whether women who buy government-subsidized private insurance through a proposed exchange system should be able to have abortions covered by their plans. Pro-choice lawmakers are trying to craft a compromise that would require insurance companies to pay for abortions out of premiums paid by patients, not out of tax dollars. Pro-choice Rep. Lois Capps, D-Calif., amended the House version of the legislation to state that abortion is not part of an "essential benefits package" that all insurance plans must provide -- meaning someone could offer a special "pro-life health insurance" plan that doesn't cover abortions, even under the reforms.



Myth 3: Obama will ban all private health insurance. Allegedly, the House proposal for healthcare reform bans private insurance. This rumor comes complete with a citation: "Right there on Page 16 is a provision making individual private medical insurance illegal," the unflaggingly pro-business paper Investors Business Daily wrote in an editorial last month. Other right-wing blogs and news outlets picked up on the idea, as well. It fits in with a broader message Republicans have been using: The reform will lead to a total government takeover of healthcare.

The IBD line is literally true -- Section 102 of the House bill says insurance companies can't independently issue any new individual policies after the legislation takes effect (though existing policies are grandfathered in). But it misses the point. Private plans aren't banned, but rather shifted into the new health insurance exchange the legislation would set up. You can still get a private policy, but the way in which you buy it changes. If you wanted to buy your own insurance, you have to do it through the government-run insurance exchange. Your policy becomes part of broader risk pools, which makes the premiums cheaper and keeps insurance companies from dumping them once they get sick. PolitiFact looked into the claim and rated the IBD editorial "pants on fire," its lowest rating -- as in, "Liar, liar, pants on fire."



Myth 4: The government can't possibly run a healthcare program. Opponents of reform trot out comparisons to government services frequently when they try to argue against a public, government-funded healthcare plan. Republicans drew up a chart that purports to show how convoluted the bureaucracy involved in any government plan would be. This message doesn't make Obama the enemy, it makes government inefficiency the enemy. "If you like the Post Office and the Department of Motor Vehicles and you think they're run well, just wait till you see Medicare, Medicaid and healthcare done by the government," conservative economist Arthur Laffer told CNN this week.

If that doesn't quite make sense, there's a reason -- Medicare and Medicaid are, of course, government-run healthcare programs. Medicare in particular is quite popular; polling shows some seniors are anxious that the reform will affect the care they already get from the government. (In fact, Democratic pollster Celinda Lake says she frequently encounters voters who say they want to keep the government out of their Medicare.)

The Department of Veterans Administration also runs a healthcare system that experts praise for its well-developed health information technology network, which lets doctors see results of tests and procedures any patient has had anywhere in the network -- eliminating the wasteful duplication that Obama says he wants to cut out of the larger healthcare world, as well.



Myth 5: Unlike private insurance, government bureaucrats will ration care. This line also makes government the enemy. "You may want healthcare that your doctor has prescribed for you," Peter Ferrara, of the anti-tax, anti-government Institute for Policy Innovation, wrote on the National Review last month. "But the rationing bureaucracy in Washington that doesn’t even know you, or your doctor, may decide that your doctor doesn’t know what he’s talking about, or that you are too old for the government to pay for your hip replacement to stop the pain, or to get an expensive triple bypass or a pacemaker operation to save your life." Since the Obama administration keeps talking about encouraging doctors to shift to outcome-based pay scales and evidence-based guidelines for what treatments or procedures to use, opponents don't have much trouble painting a troubling picture of faceless government hacks denying the care you -- or your loved ones -- need.

***** Of course, there are already plenty of faceless hacks denying people care right now; they just work for private insurance companies, not the government, and they're denying care because that helps keep the insurers' profit margins up.

At a recent House hearing, just three insurance companies testified that they had "rescinded" -- or dropped -- coverage for nearly 20,000 patients between 2003 and 2007, often after patients had submitted claims they thought would be covered!!!

Even Republicans seem to know the insurance companies can be bad. "I would always rather the devil I know than the devil I don't know," House GOP boss John Boehner said last week, explaining why going after the government works even though private insurance companies would seem to be just as much of a villain.

-- By Mike Madden Aug. 06, 2009 |

From Kentucky.Com Re: Socialized Medicine

Aug. 21, 2009
http://www.kentucky.com/latest_news/story/902829.html
 


Afraid of 'socialized' medicine? We've had it for decades
Tom Eblen - Herald-leader columnist

There's a fascinating audio clip on YouTube. It's from a 1961 phonograph record in which a politically ambitious entertainer named Ronald Reagan tries his best to scare people about "socialized medicine."

The threat he warns about is legislation to create the program we now know as Medicare.

So here we are, nearly a half-century later, with talk radio entertainers and some Republican politicians trying their best to scare people about "socialized medicine."

They see a threat in almost any meaningful reform of America's inadequate health care insurance system.

Some of their scare tactics, such as baseless claims about plans for "death panels," are truly outrageous.

  •     Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin might actually believe some of the crazy things she says, but other GOP leaders who lend legitimacy to such hogwash are simply seeking political advantage.



  • They seem to have no interest in improving health care; only in seeing President Barack Obama fail.


What makes the recent tone of the national health care debate so ridiculous is that Americans have had "socialized medicine" for decades, and it has worked pretty well.

The popular Medicare program that Reagan warned against — and later tried to deny he ever opposed — covers 43 million people who are disabled or age 65 and older.
Then there's government health care for veterans and insurance for public employees. Members of Congress have especially good government health care plans.

    * My biggest fear about health care reform is that we won't get any.

    * My biggest concern about Obama's approach is that it isn't ambitious enough, especially now that he seems willing to give up on a government insurance option.


There are many improvements that can be made in our current system with electronic medical records and various cost-containment strategies. But I think the long-term solution is some form of single-payer health insurance involving privately delivered medical care — like Medicare.


Why wouldn't it work to open Medicare, or something like it, to more people? That could provide a safety net. Then, individuals or groups could buy supplemental private insurance if they wanted more coverage and could afford it, as Medicare recipients often do.


Every major industrialized nation except ours has some form of universal health care.
 
Are the "socialized medicine" systems in Canada, Australia, Britain and other European nations perfect? Of course not.

    * But here's what you see in the United States that you don't see in those countries: millions of people with no health care coverage.

(That includes nearly 600,000 Kentuckians, or 14 percent of the state's population, according to U.S. Census estimates).


    * Here's what else you don't see in those countries:
Millions more people who are scared of losing health insurance coverage if they get sick or lose their job.
People who can't get coverage because of "pre-existing" conditions.
And people who see their life savings depleted because they get sick.

You also don't see businesses struggling to pay spiraling health care costs for employees and retirees while trying to compete in an increasingly global economy with foreign businesses that don't bear such burdens.


  • Talk show entertainers and Republican partisans have done an effective job of whipping up the frightened, ill-informed citizens we see at public meetings and protests across the country.

    * But if they want to rant about "socialized medicine," they should put their money where their mouths are.

Members of Congress who oppose a government health insurance option for citizens should give up their own government coverage. Let them try to buy a similar plan in the private market.

Then they, the media hacks and other self-described "freedom-loving conservatives" should march down to their local Medicare office and renounce their "socialized medicine" benefits, now and in the future.

Yes, I know. Fat chance.


Great article, no?
XOXO
Me



A Late Entry

Pretty. Pretty. Pretty!

.
Good Evening All;

Not too very much "news" per se, but I just have to share a few pictures with you.

Punk was very busy this afternoon. An ear of corn is a very special treat for her-

.
.
Cnv1030

I remember this was her Mama Milly's favorite treat of all.



..
.
Casey had 2 doctor appointments today-
One with her GP, and the other at the chiropractor. (This Dr., a woman, is very very good)!   And yes, all is well with Casey.
She drove out after those, and we just watched a little TV.
Of course TV watching is very strenuous, so these "kids" of mine just HAD to nap.

.
.
.
Cnv0990

And on my bed too!!!
hehehe


.
.
"Deer Apples" season has begun. 
(Unlike "horse apples", these are REAL apples).
Sue and Glenn were out to pick up the apples for their deer. 
Glenn used his roof (snow) scraper to shake the top branches to get the fruit down.
(Smart, very smart)!

.
.
Cnv0993
I think they carried about 6 or 7 pails to the pickup too

.
.
.
My pear tree is also loaded with pears. (And they are SO good too)!

.
.
.
.
Cnv0998
First to shake, and then to rake...
Their deer get treated to fallen ones that are overripe.

.
.
I also have a half~dead plum tree very near to where my beautiful garden once was.

.
.
.
.
Cnv0994
Almost every branch is LOADED this year!
(Hey, I know people like that)!

.
.
.
I have been doing a few things I probably should not be doing with respect to my back.
(So I just won't mention them at my pain management appointment tomorrow).

But,I can't wait to go. I am sure he will prescribe and then defer to the Spine Doctor next month.  Yet, in the meanwhile I should be more capable, and hopefully more comfortable also.
(This sh*t really is ridiculous, and NOT in a humorous way either).


With that appointment in mind; and out of sheer necessity with all the rains we have been getting, I mowed the lawns yesterday. 
(They look pretty darned "wunnaful" if I do say so myself)! No pics, you will have to take my word for that though.

I fully expected not to be able to move today. But I am actually in less pain than I had previously "thunk" I would be.  And that's a "happy~fying" thing!

Another "No~No" would be the walk to the woods on Sunday.

C'mon now... You all know me by now. I CANNOT STAND BEING SO FREAKIN' SEDATE, (grounded), and just rambling around outside of the house and the shed and the acres up front!

I didn't go alone though... (I had Double-Trouble to walk back there with me)!
.
.
.
Cnv1006

Sputty (mid-jump), chasing The Punkster!
Yes, pokey-me was left behind, in the dust!
Check the squash vines growing right onto the trails too.
.
.
.
They BOTH went down to the river too! (I did not, knowing full well that I would still be down there, had I ever tried to come back up).

Sputnik came back up the deer trail dry, but well behind Punk.

(Punk had, of course, fallen in the river. Twice).
.
.
.
.
.
Cnv1012 
Punk waits for Sputnik to join her...

.
.
Cnv1010

Sputty, taking his time after spying a bird way up in the pines...

But at last he gave up
decided to come home with Punk and I


.
.
If you will pardon the weeds that didn't get pulled this year...
.
.
.
.
Cnv1018
Wild. Wacky.
And so wonderfully beautiful, (in its own little fuzzy way)!
Hmmm... Now what is it?
Sorry, RT.
  ~Or shall I just "Thank You" in advance?

.
..
.
.

.
.
.
A few "sister flowers" to my top photo...

.
.
.
.
Cnv1027~~~~~~Cnv1028

Their bulbs were 2+ years old when I'd planted them earlier this year!

Maybe "wintering over" in the shed kept them fertile?
I never leave my seeds/bulbs in the house for Winter,
save for the sunflower seeds that we toast and eat...


.
.
Cnv1021 
Methinks this honey bee was confused
whether to go to the flower, or the shadow?!?


.
.
Punk still dreams of catching those airplanes...

.
.
.
Cnv1024 
And that still makes me laugh!
(At least she doesn't chase cars).
.
.
.
I had thrown a few seeds out earlier this year- right onto the mulch. This, before we'd had NO rain whatsoever, for so long-
I figured the gophers would have gotten them all, and never gave them another thought...
              ...Until I was mowing that is.

Imagine my surprise to look over and see these new little veggie plants!
.
.
.
.
Cnv1025.

I would love to tell you if they are squash, pumpkins, gourds, or cucumbers,

but I truly have no idea yet...

I also hold little hope that they will 'make it' through the fall. Or long enough to get something to eat, (besides their blossoms).
I am going to need a recipe for those just in case the frosts come too early.

I believe the fog might be thick tomorrow morning-
And y'all know what that means in Fall...

.
.
Cnv1022 
Over on the SW corner of the old shed,
where I have NEVER had these before
I found a few Ground Cherry plants!
.
OH, the ground cherries are SO good!
If you happen to see them at a Farmer~Market or the like, please just ask to try one.  I will be betting that you will love them too!
I am waiting for mine to ripen. The outer wrapping will be beige, see~through, and almost screenlike. The fruit will be yellowYUM!!!
.
.
.
Not everything out there is edible though... Not cosmos.
.
.
.
Cnv1019 

And certainly not the grasshopper that is trying to eat it either
.
hehehe

Not that I have ever tried any chocolate covered insects.
Just that I don't want to...
...Well, not "on purpose" anyway



So tell me, have YOU ever eaten anything,
chocolate covered,
with 6 legs,
(and with an exoskeleton)?!?
.
.


Hard to see- (Sorry, it was getting pretty dark)... 
.
.

Cnv0987 
But check out the humongous storm cloud
that actually blew over late Friday afternoon

.
.
I'd better close for tonight...
But will leave you reassured that the rug below is already in the dryer!


.

.
.Cnv1032 
hehehe
Oh she had so much fun with that little cob of corn!
.
.
Hope all is well in your little corner of the world!
My love to all.

XOXO
Me