[My] Life in Wisconsin

Animal Cruelty (ASPCA).


If you are not sickened by any of this, please let me know so I can remove you from my friends list.

XOXO
Anne


Note too there are many individual links on every page I have copied.
Please take a moment go to the links to learn more about any topic.




"
The crowd's roar dulled to a hum as the next two fighters appeared...
The previous match had been short, as one contestant quickly outmatched his opponent, mauling him badly and tearing off an ear.

But this final fight matched two highly respected and feared combatants. They eyed each other warily as their handlers finished corner preparations.

Spectators came to the edge of their seats, and fathers lifted children to their shoulders for a better view as the judge stepped to the center, called the dogs to their scratch lines and yelled, "Let 'em go!"

A cheer arose as the dogs charged across the pit and violently slammed into each other, teeth flashing as they sought a vulnerable target.
The dogs came apart once, when the brindle appeared to give up, and turned for a moment.

They were returned to their scratch lines and held.
Both dogs were breathing hard and bleeding.

"Let 'em go," the judge called again.
If the brindle failed to attack now, he would lose.
But he was a game dog, and responded to an instinct bred into him over generations and nurtured through training.
As the brindle charged across his line, his opponent's handler released him with the encouragement,
"Finish him, Bo."
Tired and weakened by his wounds, the brindle was slow to meet Bo's ferocious attacks.
Bo grabbed the brindle's right front leg in powerful jaws, bit and twisted.

The "snap" of breaking bone was heard as the brindle was flipped onto his back, while Bo sought a better grip on his opponent’s throat.

Remarkably, as the judge ordered the handlers to break the dogs, the brindle tried to crawl after Bo, still intent on fighting.
His handler gently wrapped him in a blanket, saying, "No more, boy. It's over."

"

Stolen from here:
http://www.aspca.org/fight-animal-cruelty/dog-fighting/history-of-dog-fighting.html

For more than a century, humans have deliberately pitted dog-aggressive dogs who will instinctively give their all in staged fights against one another. Why are animal welfare advocates no closer to ending this brutal bloodsport?

This fight could have occurred in any state, in a barn or a city warehouse.
The participants could have been Caucasian, African American or Hispanic, and the year could have been 1897 or 1997. Since the 1800's, dog fighting has attracted the attention and admiration of royalty, politicians, doctors, farmers and police officers, as well as the wrath of animal protectionists, who have fought hard to end it. Yet achieving a better understanding of this bloodsport, rather than simply condemning it, must precede any real effort at wiping it out...


Read more about the history of dog fighting...
http://www.aspca.org/fight-animal-cruelty/dog-fighting/history-of-dog-fighting.html




Cruelty Glossary
*** Farm Animal Cruelty Glossary about the same (below)...

  • Animal Cruelty: Acts of violence or neglect perpetrated against animals are considered animal cruelty. Some examples are overt abuse, dog fighting and cockfighting, and denying a companion animal the basic necessities of care, such as food, water or shelter.
  • Animal Hoarding or Collecting: Obsessive/compulsive disorder in which individual keeps a large number of animals-sometimes more than 100-in his or her home, and neglects to care for the animals and the home environment; "collectors" are usually in extreme denial about the situation. Technically, hoarding can be considered a crime, as it is a form of neglect.
  • Animal Welfare Act: Act passed into law in 1966 that ensures that pets and animals used in research and for exhibition purposes are provided humane care and treatment. The act also assures the humane treatment of animals during transportation in commerce and outlaws the sale or use of animals who have been stolen.
  • Backyard Breeder: Individual whose pet either gets bred by accident, or who breeds on purpose for a variety of reasons-a desire to make extra money, for example, or to let the children witness "the miracle of birth." The animals involved are usually not tested for genetic or health.
  • Battery Cage: A wire cage, measuring no more than sixteen inches wide, in which four or five hens are housed. These cages are lined up in rows and stacked several levels high on factory farms. This system of production has been outlawed by countries in the European Union.
  • Branding: The practice of burning an identifying mark onto the body of an animal using an extremely hot iron stamp, or “brand,” pressed hard into the animal’s flesh for several seconds without anesthesia. Ranchers use brands to distinguish their cattle and hogs from those owned by others.
  • Broilers: Chickens raised for meat consumption on modern factory farms. These birds have been selected or bred so that their bodies grow very rapidly. Learn more about our efforts to protect animals in factory farms.
  • Bullhook: Tool commonly used in the training and management of elephants. According to accounts by several former Ringling Bros. employees and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), elephants who perform in Ringling Bros. circuses are repeatedly beaten with sharp bullhooks.
  • Canned Hunts: The canned hunt is a practice in which hunters pay fees to shoot and kill exotic animals in a confined area from which they are unable to escape.
  • Charreadas (also Charrerias): Rodeos popular in Mexico and the American Southwest. Aspects of this sport—specifically, the two events known as colas (bull-tailing) and manganas (horse-tripping)—are considered by many to be extreme cruelty. Horse-tripping has been banned in California, Texas, New Mexico and Maine.
  • Cockfighting: A blood sport in which two roosters specifically bred for aggressiveness are placed beak to beak in a small ring and encouraged to fight to the death.
  • Debeaking: A process that involves cutting through bone, cartilage and soft tissue with a blade to remove the top half and the bottom third of a chicken’s, turkey’s or duck’s beak. This measure is taken to reduce the excessive feather pecking and cannibalism seen among stressed, overcrowded birds in factory farms.
  • Declawing: The act of surgically amputating the entire distal phalanx, or end bone, of an animal's toes. The surgery is non-reversible, and the animal suffers significant pain during recovery. Declawing has been outlawed in many countries in Europe.
  • Downers: Animals headed for slaughter who become too sick or injured to walk unassisted. The Downed Animal Protection Act outlaws the practice of transporting downers to auctions and stockyards for slaughter and requires that these animals be humanely euthanized.
  • Ear Cropping: The cropping of a purebred dog's ears to conform to a breed standard. Although this unnecessary cosmetic surgery is regularly performed by some veterinarians, it is often done by untrained individuals, without anesthesia, in unsterile environments.
  • Electric Cattle Prod (also called a Hotshot): A device that can deliver an electric current to an animal. It is used to stimulate movement in animals; commonly used with livestock and in rodeos. When animals are poked with the electrified end, they receive a high-voltage, low-current electrical shock. The short shock is not strong enough to kill a large animal, but is enough to cause some pain.
  • Factory Farm: A large-scale industrial site where many animals raised for food—mainly chickens, turkeys, cows and pigs—are confined and treated with hormones and antibiotics to maximize growth and prevent disease. The animals lead short, painful lives; factory farms are also associated with various environmental hazards.
  • Felony Cruelty: Animal cruelty is considered a crime in all 50 states. But in some states it is taken more seriously-and carries a felony charge, rather than a misdemeanor.(Look up your state's animal cruelty laws. See link below).
  • Feral Cat: A cat too poorly socialized to be handled and who cannot be placed into a typical pet home; a subpopulation of free-roaming cats.
  • Foie Gras: To make this pricey gourmet delicacy, birds are force-fed enormous quantities of food three times daily via a pipe that is inserted into the esophagus. This leads to enlargement of the animal's liver and sometimes rupturing of the internal organs, infection and a painful death. The process typically lasts up to four weeks, until the birds are slaughtered. Learn more about our efforts to protect animals in factory farms.
  • Forced Molting: Process by which egg-laying hens are starved for up to 14 days, exposed to changing light patterns and given no water in order to shock their bodies into molting. It is common for 5 percent to 10 percent of hens to die during this process.
  • Hog-Dog Fighting (also called Hog-Baiting or Hog-Dog Rodeos): A blood sport in which a hog or feral pig is mauled by a trained fighting dog in an enclosed pen. Because its legality, as determined by state anti-cruelty laws, can be vague, many states, particularly in the American South where hog-dog fighting is more common, have passed laws specifically criminalizing it.
  • Intentional Cruelty: Intentional cruelty occurs when an individual purposely inflicts physical harm or injury on an animal; usually an indicator of a serious human behavior problem..
  • Internet Hunting (also called Remote-Controlled or Computer-Assisted Hunting): Combines video shooting games with the power of Internet technology to allow a remote computer user to kill real animals. At the game ranch that the “hunters” see on their monitors, a gun is mounted on a robotic tripod controlled by their computer mouse. Animals are lured within close range with food, at which time the armchair hunter can line up a shot and “fire” at will. Legislation has been passed to ban Internet hunting in many states.
  • Killer Buyers: Middlemen who travel from horse auction to horse auction, purchasing any horse they can. They eventually sell these animals to slaughterhouses for human consumption, but regularly subject horses to cruel and inhumane treatment-i.e. beating them, depriving them of food and water.
  • Leghold Trap: The steel-jaw leghold trap is most often used to trap wild animals who are killed for their fur, such as beavers, lynx, bobcats and otters. Trapped animals usually do not die instantly, and are left to suffer intense pain, dehydration and starvation. Sometimes dogs and cats who are allowed to roam outdoors are also caught and killed in these traps.
  • Neglect: The failure to provide an animal with the most basic of requirements of food, water, shelter and veterinary care. Neglect is often the result of simple ignorance on the animal owner's part and is usually handled by requiring the owner to correct the situation.
  • Pit Bull: A great deal of confusion surrounds this term. This label is used for a type of short-coated large terrier, anywhere from 40 to 80 pounds, characterized by wide, powerful jaws and a muscular, stocky build. Some of the dogs that fall under this category are purebred-either the American Staffordshire Terrier (the "AmStaff") or the American Pit Bull Terrier; term is often used for pit bull mixes.
  • Premarin: A hormone replacement therapy drug made from pregnant mares' urine, collected from horses who are confined in stalls for half the year, strapped to urine collection funnels.
  • Pound Seizure: The transfer or sale of shelter animals to research facilities of any kind, including those that engage in scientific research and experimentation. The ASPCA is unalterably opposed to this practice. As of 2004, 14 states and many communities prohibit pound seizure either by state law or local regulation.
  • Puppy Mill/Kitty Mill: Breeding facilities that produce large numbers of purebred dogs and cats. The animals are regularly sold to pet shops across the country. Documented problems of puppy mills include overbreeding, inbreeding, poor veterinary care and overcrowding.
  • Soring: Abuses to show horses include painful "soring," whereby a mechanical or chemical agent is applied to the lower leg or hoof of a horse, for the purpose of "enhancing" the animal's gait, forcing him to throw his front legs up and out. This is often done to Tennessee Walking Horses.
  • Stray: A currently or recently owned dog or cat who may be lost; usually well socialized but may become wary over time. A stray's kittens or pups may be feral.
  • Spent Hen: After one or two years of producing eggs at an unnaturally high rate, female fowl in factory farms are classified as "spent hens.” No longer financially profitable, they are slaughtered.
  • Tail Banding: A method of docking an animal’s tail in which a rubber band or similar ligature is wrapped tightly around the tail at the desired point of removal. This cuts off the blood supply to the end of the tail, which atrophies and usually falls away after a few days. Banding is legal in the United States, and is frequently practiced by laypersons on dairy cows.
  • Tail Docking: The cutting of a purebred dog's tail to conform to a breed standard. Although this unnecessary cosmetic surgery is regularly performed by some veterinarians, it is often done by untrained individuals, without anesthesia, in unsterile environments.
  • Tenectomy: An operation performed on cats that severs the tendons in the toes so that the cat is unable to extend her nails to scratch. Owners who choose to have this surgery performed must clip their cat’s nails regularly, as the cat is unable to maintain them herself.
  • Tethering: The act of chaining/tieing an animal, usually a dog, to a stationary object as a primary means of confinement. Tethering is a risk factor for aggressive behavior and dog bites.
  • Trap-Neuter-Return (TNR): A method of managing feral cat colonies that involves trapping the animals, spaying or neutering them, vaccinating them and returning them to where they were found. The ASPCA promotes this ethical and humane practice.
  • White Veal: From birth to slaughter at five months, calves used to produce "formula-fed" or "white" veal are confined to two-foot-wide crates and chained to inhibit movement. They are fed an iron-and fiber-deficient diet resulting in anemia; the lack of exercise retards muscle development, resulting in pale, tender meat.

http://www.aspca.org/fight-animal-cruelty/cruelty-glossary.html






  • Barrels: Metal barrels are often used as shelter for fighting dogs. Placed horizontally, an entrance hole is cut out from one side, for the dog to enter and exit its shelter. Sometimes plastic barrels, attached to poles, are also used for this purpose.
  • Bite Stick or Prying Stick: These come in a variety of shapes and sizes, but are usually short wooden sticks with tapered ends. A bite stick is inserted into the side of a dog’s mouth, and then manipulated to make the dog release its hold on its opponent.
  • Cajun Rules: A detailed list of 19 rules covering all aspects of fights. The rules were created in the 1950s by G.A. “Gaboon” Trahan, a police chief in Louisiana.
  • Campaign: A fighting dog’s career.
  • Chains: Chains of varying length and weight serve a dual purpose; to confine a dog, as well as to strengthen their neck muscles.
  • Champion: A dog who has won three or more fights.
  • Convention: A large dog fighting event, sometimes with accompanying activities like music and food.
  • Dogmen: Professional trainers and handlers.
  • Gameness: A dogs tenacity and willingness to fight.
  • Grand Champion: An undefeated dog with five or more wins.
  • “Jenny” or “Cat Mill”: A projecting pole or spoke in which a dog is harnessed. A small bait animal is attached to the leading spoke to entice the dog.
  • Non-Prospect: A dog who is deemed unqualified to fight. They are often neglected, abandoned or killed.
  • Prospect: A young, aggressive dog identified as a potentially good fighting dog.
  • Rape Stand or Breeding Stand: This is a stand used to strap and immobilize female dogs for breeding purposes.
  • Roll: A dog’s first fight, takes place when the dog is around 15 months of age. The fight usually lasts about 10 minutes and allows handlers to measure each animal's demeanor.
  • Scratch Lines: Lines in a dog fighting ring behind which the animals start in a match.
  • Spring Pole: A spring pole usually consists of a rope, hide, inner tubing or tire, which is suspended from a large spring attached to a tree limb, rafter or pole. The dog is made to jump up and grab at it, and then hang suspended in mid-air for extended periods of time. It is used to reinforce the strength of the dog’s bite.
  • Keep: The training a fighting dog undergoes prior to a fight. It typically lasts about six weeks.
  • The Show: A cruel "contest" in which two dogs—specifically bred, conditioned, and trained to fight—are placed in a pit to fight each other for the purpose of entertainment and gambling.
  • Treadmill or Slatmill: Used for endurance, strength and speed training. A slatmill is a treadmill whose running surface is composed of wooden slats.
  • Washtub: Dogs are washed down in tubs immediately prior to fighting, to ensure they have not been coated with a noxious substance that may be harmful to the opposing dog.
  • Weights: Weights are used for strength training as well, and can be attached directly to the dog’s collar. They can also be attached as long cylinders to chains, increasing the weight that the dog has to drag when it moves.
http://www.aspca.org/fight-animal-cruelty/dog-fighting/dog-fighting-glossary.html







  • Animal Cruelty: Acts of violence or neglect perpetrated against animals are considered animal cruelty. Some examples are overt abuse, dog fighting and cockfighting, and denying companion animals the basic necessities of care, such as food, water and shelter.
  • Battery Cage: A wire cage, measuring no more than sixteen inches wide, in which four or five hens are housed. These cages are lined up in rows and stacked several levels high on factory farms. This system of production has been outlawed by countries in the European Union. Learn more about efforts to protect animals in factory farms.
  • Branding: The practice of burning an identifying mark onto the body of an animal using an extremely hot iron stamp, or “brand,” pressed hard into the animal’s flesh for several seconds without anesthesia. Ranchers use brands to distinguish their cattle and hogs from those owned by others.
  • Broilers: Chickens raised for meat consumption on modern factory farms. These birds have been selected or bred so that their bodies grow very rapidly. Learn more about efforts to protect animals in factory farms.
  • Debeaking: A process that involves cutting through bone, cartilage and soft tissue with a blade to remove the top half and the bottom third of a chicken’s, turkey’s or duck’s beak. This measure is taken to reduce the excessive feather pecking and cannibalism seen among stressed, overcrowded birds in factory farms. Learn more about efforts to protect animals in factory farms.
  • Downers: Animals headed for slaughter who become too sick or injured to walk unassisted. The Downed Animal Protection Act outlaws the practice of transporting downers to auctions and stockyards for slaughter and requires that these animals be humanely euthanized.
  • Electric Cattle Prod (also called a Hotshot): A device that can deliver an electric current to an animal. It is used to stimulate movement in animals; commonly used with livestock and in rodeos. When animals are poked with the electrified end, they receive a high-voltage, low-current electrical shock. The short shock is not strong enough to kill a large animal, but is enough to cause some pain.
  • Factory Farm: A large-scale industrial site where many animals raised for food—mainly chickens, turkeys, cows and pigs—are confined and treated with hormones and antibiotics to maximize growth and prevent disease. The animals lead short, painful lives; factory farms are also associated with various environmental hazards.
  • Foie Gras: To make this pricey gourmet delicacy, birds are force-fed enormous quantities of food three times daily via a pipe that is inserted into the esophagus. This leads to enlargement of the animal's liver and possible rupturing of the internal organs, infection and a painful death. The process typically lasts up to four weeks, until the birds are slaughtered.
  • Forced Molting: Process by which egg-laying hens are starved for up to 14 days, exposed to changing light patterns and given no water in order to shock their bodies into molting. It is common for 5 percent to 10 percent of hens to die during this process. Learn more about efforts to protect animals in factory farms.
  • Killer Buyers: Middlemen who travel from horse auction to horse auction, purchasing any horse they can. They eventually sell these animals to slaughterhouses for human consumption, but regularly subject horses to cruel and inhumane treatment—i.e. beating them, depriving them of food and water. Learn more about horse cruelty.
  • Neglect: The failure to provide an animal with the most basic of requirements of food, water, shelter and veterinary care. Neglect is often the result of simple ignorance on the owner's part and is usually handled by requiring the owner to correct the situation.
  • Premarin®: A hormone replacement therapy drug made from pregnant mares' urine (PMU), collected from horses who are confined in stalls for half the year, strapped to urine collection funnels. Learn more about Premarin®.
  • Soring: Abuses to show horses include painful "soring," whereby a mechanical or chemical agent is applied to the lower leg or hoof of a horse, for the purpose of "enhancing" the animal's gait, forcing him to throw his front legs up and out. This is often done to Tennessee Walking Horses. Learn more about horse cruelty.
  • Spent Hen: After one or two years of producing eggs at an unnaturally high rate, female fowl are classified as "spent hens.” No longer financially profitable for factory farmers, they are slaughtered. Learn more about efforts to protect animals in factory farms.
  • Tail Banding: A method of docking an animal’s tail in which a rubber band or similar ligature is wrapped tightly around the tail at the desired point of removal. This cuts off the blood supply to the end of the tail, which atrophies and usually falls away after a few days. Banding is legal in the United States, and is frequently practiced by laypersons on dairy cows.
  • White Veal: From birth to slaughter at five months, calves used to produce "formula-fed" or "white" veal are confined to two-foot-wide crates and chained to inhibit movement. They are fed an iron- and fiber-deficient diet that causes anemia; the lack of exercise retards muscle development, resulting in pale, tender meat.

http://www.aspca.org/fight-animal-cruelty/farm-animal-cruelty/farm-animal-cruelty-glossary.html





Most animal cruelty laws vary from state to state.
Knowing your state's laws is crucial to help fight animal cruelty.
The ASPCA offers this online database with more than 550 animal cruelty laws -- and their penalties -- from all 50 states. This database, maintained by the ASPCA Government Affairs and Public Policy department, will be a dynamic resource for providing information relating to animal cruelty laws.
You can select your state
, or even use our keyword search to find a specific topic.


  • Disclaimer: The ASPCA is providing you this listing of state laws to assist you in reporting cruelty in your area. Your local and state police are generally mandated to enforce all laws in your state, including animal cruelty, even if these laws are not included in your state's penal code. Please contact them should you witness animal cruelty (including animal neglect), or have information regarding an incident of animal cruelty in your area. Please be aware that local law enforcement may have a limited familiarity with animal cruelty issues and make sure you inform the police of the specific section of law listed under the animal cruelty summary and provide them with the summary to assist them in their investigation.
  • Please note: The ASPCA only has law enforcement powers in New York State. If you live in New York State, you may also contact your local or state police to report animal cruelty.

http://www.aspca.org/fight-animal-cruelty/lobby-for-animals/state-animal-cruelty-laws/








Don't let your pet be the victim of a cruel act!

The ASPCA Animal Poison Control Center receives many calls from owners whose animals were maliciously poisoned—sometimes right in their own backyards.
APCC has provided the following tips to prevent this from happening to your animal companions:

1.
Be a good neighbor! Please don’t allow your pets to have access to your neighbors’ yards and trash cans. If your dog is an incessant barker and/or howls and whines while you are away, you may want to work with an animal behaviorist or dog trainer to solve the problem. Should your neighbors have concerns, try to address them in a positive, constructive manner to avoid serious conflicts.

2. Is your pet allowed outdoors in your fenced-in or otherwise secure area? It’s smart to do routine checks of this enclosed area.

3. Be sure to remove unfamiliar or questionable items from the enclosure.

4. Supervise your pets when they are outdoors whenever possible. Do not allow your pets to spend significant amounts of time unsupervised outdoors.

5. Develop relationships with neighbors who have pets. You can join forces to create a neighborhood watch for the companion animals in the area. Be alert for anything out of the ordinary!

6. Provide a safe, confined area with a secure gate when pets are left alone outdoors.

7. Never let your pet run loose or allow him to roam free. Animals who are allowed to roam simply have more opportunities to get into potentially poisonous substances.

8. Teach your pet not to accept food or treats from strangers.

9. Report any suspicious behavior to local authorities. Remember, animal cruelty is a crime!

10. If you suspect that your pet has been poisoned,
call the ASPCA Animal Poison Control Center immediately at:
(888) 426-4435.
 
For more information on substances in and around your home that could be potentially toxic to your pet, read what our experts have to say.

http://www.aspca.org/fight-animal-cruelty/top-10-tips-to-prevent.html





www.animaland.org/

From cats to canaries, from Dobermans to dachshunds, our pets often seem to know how we feel. They comfort us when we're hurt, and make us happy when we're sad. They share our joy, and stay by our side when times are bad.

But, sometimes, some people are mean to animals.
How do you explain this to a child?

What Is the Impact of Animal Cruelty?
Mahatma Gandhi said, "The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated." Animals feel pain and fear like we do, but they are often helpless victims because they can't say what happened to them. In fact, some people choose to abuse animals instead of people for this very reason! If we wish to create a humane society, we must stop cruelty against those who are most vulnerable-like animals.

Cruelty toward animals does more than cause other living, feeling beings to experience pain and fear. Like the death of a canary in a coal mine, violence toward animals can be an indicator that people are also in danger. Someone who commits animal abuse may have serious psychological problems.
Studies have found that many people convicted of violent crimes had a history of animal cruelty. Jeffrey Dahmer, Ted Bundy, Andrew Cunanan, David "Son of Sam" Berkowitz, and Albert "Boston Strangler" DeSalvo were cruel to animals before they started hurting people.
Adults are not the only ones whose cruelty to animals can be a sign of deeper troubles.
Many murderous children and teenagers-such as Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold of Columbine High School-also have histories of animal cruelty.

Animals in homes with family violence are also often victims of violence.
One study found that animals were abused in 88 percent of the homes in which a child was abused. Another study found that 83 percent of families reported for animal abuse also had children at high risk of abuse or neglect. Although most of the abuse toward the animals came from the parents, about a quarter of abused children abuse animals.

What Can You Do About It?
"Animal cruelty is a national problem," says ASPCA Supervisory Special Investigator Annemarie Lucas. "Violence towards animals crosses all racial and socioeconomic lines and reaches from coast to coast." No matter where you live, there is a lot you can do to stop animal cruelty.

One of the most powerful tools we have for preventing cruelty to animals is education.
It is important to plant the seeds of kindness in children early, and to nurture their development as the child grows. Children not only need to learn what they shouldn't do, but also what they can and should do. When children see that their pets are happy and loving, it will make the child feel good, too. This in turn will help the children care for their pets' feelings.

However, since people don't always realize that they are being cruel, adults need education, too.
If you are not a teacher, please urge your local schools to integrate humane education into their curricula.
If you are a teacher, bring humane education into your classroom.
To help you, your local shelter may have outreach programs, education materials, camps, etc. You can also find plenty of humane ideas and activities on our children's website, ASPCA Animaland, and our site for educators, librarians and parents, ASPCA Education.

Every child is unique, and adults should use caution and careful thought when discussing cruelty with children.
  • In general, children under four simply should not be exposed to cruelty.
  • Two-year-olds can begin to learn that their actions make others-including animals-happy and sad.
  • With two- and three-year-olds, discuss their own experiences and how they would feel if they were treated the way they treat their pets or other animals in their immediate lives. Help them relate not only the ways they would feel hurt, but also the ways they would feel happy.
  • With all children under six or so, you may wish to help guide their hands so they can learn how to pet and hold their animal companions. Children do not have fine control over their movements and impulses—they will want to treat their pets with love, but will need a little help from you to do it correctly.
  • Children who are between about four and six often begin to understand basic moral concepts, such as fairness. These children can learn to be kind to animals because the animals "deserve" it. Children may discuss injuries they have had themselves, but do not introduce discussions about other types of injuries. Try to limit discussions of animal cruelty to the simple fact that animals can be hurt; do not describe how they can be hurt (e.g., starvation, physical abuse, etc.).
  • With most children who are six to ten years old, you can begin to discuss why someone might be mean to an animal-as long as you make sure the child always keeps in mind that it is wrong to hurt animals. In addition, do not let discussions of animal cruelty satisfy the morbid curiosity some children of this age may have. Children of this age often form some of their earliest memories and impressions about the state of the world beyond their families. It is very important that adults filter what these children perceive! Even if children witness violence as a "bad example" or as a way NOT to act, they are still witnessing violence, and can be strongly affected by it.
  • Many children between 10 and 14 are exploring their self-image and reflecting upon their relationships with others. Studies indicate that children of this age are still strongly affected by violence, so discussions about animal cruelty should still be kept free of details about the violence. Nonetheless, the issue can be raised directly—if delicately—with most of these children. Adults should make it clear that they do not condone violence in their own thoughts and behavior. Children of this age are finely attuned to the words and actions of adults, and still rely on them as role models.

Parents, teachers, and trusted adults can also discuss with 10- to 14-year-olds how they would act if their peers or friends treated animals cruelly. By couching the advice in terms of what you would do if you were in a given situation, you can help children overcome peer pressure and follow what they know is right. These children may encounter others abusing animals—knowing that they are in the right and will be supported for standing up to it is very important at this age of strong peer pressure.

Again, with all children-even older teens-keep in mind the importance of modeling appropriate behaviors.
Our children do emulate us, even if they wouldn't admit it. If we treat animals cruelly or as unfeeling machines, our children will probably think that this is right or, at least, normal. The more a child identifies with an adult, the greater an impact that person will have on the child-in both good ways and bad ways.

Children who know of animal cruelty should tell an adult about it.
Make sure children know who they can trust—such as parents, teachers, police officers, etc.—and nurture their trust so they can tell you.

For an in-depth explanation of animal cruelty written especially for older kids, please visit the Real Issues section at ASPCA Animaland, the website for kids who love animals.

http://www2.aspca.org/site/PageServer?pagename=kids_ri_home



RESOURCES
DeViney, E., Dickert, J., & Lockwood, R. (1983). The care of pets within child abusing families. International Journal
for the Study of Animal Problems, 3, 321-329.
Ascione, F. R., Weber, C. V., & Wood, D. S. (1997). Animal welfare and domestic violence: Final report. Logan, Utah: Utah State University.
Further Reading:
Ascione, F. R., & Arkow, P. (Eds.). (1999). Child abuse, domestic violence, and animal abuse: Linking the circles of compassion for prevention and intervention. West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press.

http://www.aspca.org/fight-animal-cruelty/talking-to-kids-about-animal.html



76 comments:

  1. Sweet Annie, I could only get through the first three paragraphs of the story at the beginning of your blog. Being such an animal lover it sickens me to think anyone would use them in any way that would cause them harm. But I know this goes on. Even though Pitt Bulls are the dog of choice in my immediate area, I don't hear of any dog fighting going on, but cock fighting is common. Not too long ago there was even a Mayor from two cities over arrested in a cock fighting sting. Just a good `ol boy having his fun. It's just too disgusting for words.

    I did read the other parts of your blog though. I wanted to comment on something in the poisoning section. In regard to teaching your dog not to accept food from strangers -this is a very hard thing to train your dog to do. It usually involves a shock collar and several other people to help you over a long period of time. Military and Police dog trainers will tell you that this is one of the most difficult training procedures there is. I finally have Doc trained to wait for my command before proceeding to his bowl to eat, that's the first step - that alone has taken him six months of twice daily training to accomplish.

    At the dog training company I worked for in Orlando our trainers taught our client's dogs, in our advanced protection training program, not to accept food from strangers. According to the retired Military dog trainers we employed as trainers the easiest and quietest way to kill a dog (in order to break into, or invade a home) is to toss the dog a meatball with a mercury capsule in it. Fifteen minutes, at the most, and the dog is dead. Scary thought. That's one of the reasons why I never leave any of my pets outside unattended.

    Thanks for posting this Annie.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have never understood and will never understand how someone can find pleasure in watching 2 of anything going at each other until the death. It is beyond my comprehension. Dogs most especially... a dog loves unconditionally and its so difficult for me to understand how someone can be mean to a dog.. Who am I kidding.. I find cruelty unexplainable.

    I cant watch Animal precinct.. I cant watch or read anything about animals being hurt or abused. I just sit and cry.

    ReplyDelete
  3. For the people (ie: inhumane a##holes) who are involved in it, it's a sporting event where there's LOTS of money changing hands, from the breeders, to the trainers, on down to those betting. It's nothing more than exploitation of a living thing, but they only see these animals as objects, or as a gambling wage.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think anyone that neglects, abuses or treats animals in anything than a loving way should be taken out and shot. Myself, I also think that the pit bull breed of dogs should be banned and destroyed. They are the most vicious and dangerous dogs I've ever seen. A friend of Cee's from school was viciously attacked for no reason at all. They never did find the pit bull that attacked him and the young man had to endure rabie shots and had 12 stitches in his "forbidden zone" if you catch my drift. All this young man did was walk down the sidewalk in front of this house and the dog came outta no where and attacked him. I don't care what anyone says....it is not how they are raised, it is in their breeding to attack and kill and the breed should be destroyed forever. Sorry but that's my opinion and I'll stick with it until the day i die....hopefully not at the jaws of a pit bull.

    ReplyDelete
  5. You can thank irresponsible breeders for this. Pitt Bulls can be great dogs, docile, devoted and excellent protection dogs. But when breeders stop caring about what they're cranking out and when they get the most money for dogs with "a fighting nature" you can bet they're going to continue breeding irresponsibly.

    If we start banning every breed that has ever savagely mauled someone we'd have very few breeds left. Personally, I'm closely guarding the fact that I own a German Shepherd from the insurance company that insures my home. Because German Shepherds are on "the list" of viscous dogs, if my insurance company finds out I have one my insurance rates would be triple of what I pay now. Interestingly enough Dalmatians have just recently been added to "the list", more than likely because someone has been killed or seriously injured by a Dalmatian. There are already several cities in the US where it's illegal to own certain breeds of dogs. I think that's going too far, you can't judge an entire breed by a dozen or so dogs, it's unfair to all the wonderful dogs who belong to that breed.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It's a known fact that Dalmations are not dogs to have around kids. They are not kid friendly though some make them out to be. As far as hiding the fact that you have german shepard, that would constitute fraud. What happens if it attacks someone? I'd much rather someone pay a high insurance rate than not be fully insured to take care of medical bills that the dog would incur in the event that it attacked someone. The insurance company would find out then and they most likely would drop you and then where would you be? No insurance and most likely would be hard to get insurance in the future.

    Docile or not, it IS in their breeding for decades to attack and kill...most of the time for no reason at all. Just ask Cee's friend. That poor boy could have ended up not being able to have kids because of that dog. Most dog maulings (around here anyway) are almost always done by a pit and the people that have been attacked have done nothing to warrant an attack----Will was just walking down the street to a friend's house, one lady was out jogging IN THE STREET and the pit jumped the chain linked fence and got her and almost killed her. Lucky for her, someone happened to come down the street to help her. And all those docile cases where the dog attacks their owner's own kids....yep, it's in their blood to attack and once they get the taste of blood, they should be shot, put down or whatever because they WILL attack and kill again. Give me a yappin' little ankle biter any day.

    ReplyDelete
  7. From http://www.dogbreedinfo.com/americanpitbull.htm

    The APBT, as registered by the UKC, is an individual breed of dog and does not refer to just any ill-bred, mindless warrior-type mongrel. At one time, the Pit Bull was a much loved, trustworthy companion. People who chose to train these dogs to fight are chiefly responsible for the banning and witch-hunting that has been sweeping the U.S. The media, however, should not go unmentioned, for it is also responsible for escalating isolated incidences in a relentless and attention-getting way. In a lot of cases when the media is reporting about a Pit Bull attacking, it is indeed not even a Pit Bull at all, but a mixed breed of some sort, or another bull breed all together. In fact, one time there was a report on KYW news in Philadelphia about two Pit Bulls attacking a person. I called the news station and asked if they knew the dogs were in fact a purebred American Pit Bull Terriers, or another bull breed of some sort, or a mutt for that matter. They told me they did not know, I would have to call the police station to verify that information. I asked them how they could report something that they were not sure of. They had no answer for me and they were not sure of the dog's breed. Even after admitting that to me on the phone, they kept calling it a Pit Bull. The Pit Bull's future has been perhaps irreparably undone and everyone is to blame except the dog itself. This very loyal dog is too set on pleasing his owner, and ironically this is the root of his own undoing. Accompanying this need to please are remarkable abilities of all kinds. Jack Dempsy, Teddy Roosevelt and Jack Johnson are just a few people who have owned Pit Bulls. Pit Bulls excel in practically every canine task including herding, guarding, hunting, policing, cart pulling and ratting. A Pit Bull, named Banddog Dread, holds more canine working titles than ANY other breed. The owner's name is Diane Jessup and you can reference her book, "The Working Pit Bull." It tells you all of Dread's accomplishments. These dogs are truly capable of many tasks.

    As far as committing fraud, by not revealing to my insurance company that I have a GSD, I am joined in that with thousands of other GSD owners who feel insurance companies have no right dictating which breed of dogs are acceptable to own and which aren't. I, not my insurance company, take full responsibility for anything my dog does. There have also been multiple class action law suits won against insurance companies for this type of discriminatory behavior. I will give you this... if a dog ever hurts any other living thing then I whole heartedly agree that it should be destroyed.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I think the "handlers" should be pitted head to head in a fight like this. These poor animals never know the love and true companionship that God intended at their creation.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Any and all animal cruelty is sickening an disturbing. I have more to say but am not having the type a day that would lead me to argue maturely here.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I have to disagree with this... I don't think ANY animal should be banned and destroyed. I have come across a few pit bulls in the last year or so that have been the friendliest, kindest and gentlest dogs that I have ever been in contact with. And YES, I let my daughter play with them! It is NOT the dogs fault it is the OWNERS/BREEDERS fault. If you show your dog love and treat him/her right along with good training, you will have a well behaved animal. On the other hand, if the animal isn't shown love and caring and is taught to fight and be vicious, then you will have the killer that Anne posted about...

    And you know what they say about opinions...

    ReplyDelete
  11. Excuse me but please go back and read EVERYTHING I posted. Pits are the absolute breed of dog and it is in their blood to kill and maime living beings. If you had read my previous comments, I stated verified cases here in the town I live in where so called "well behaved pits" attacked for no reason at all...one even jumping a fence to get at a woman jogging down the street. DESTROY THIS BREED!

    Ilove the fact you pretty much called me an ass....whatever! I know the young man that was attacked and Cee also goes to school with him. So don't tell me it's all the breeders/owners fault. it's the breed's fault!

    ReplyDelete
  12. I DID read EVERYTHING that you posted... The pit that attacked the boy you said 'came out of nowhere'... How do YOU know how that pit was raised??? It takes the breeder/owner to bring out the bad nature of these animals. Do you think that a little pit puppy has the knowledge to KILL and MAME someone??? NO! It HAS to be taught!

    I didn't call you an ass... I just said, "You know what they say about opinions." Take that as you will. That also INCLUDES my opinion. But my opinion is just that MY OPINION...

    To want to kill an entire breed over what a few in the breed do is cruel also!

    ReplyDelete
  13. A few?????? Last summer alone there were no less than three attacks by pits. If you wish to defend a "killer" breed, that's your choice. I for one think it should be destroyed. I would never let any of my kids or grandkids around anyone that has a pit. If there's a pit, my kids go no where near that property. PERIOD!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Yes, a few... Not all pit bulls are killers.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Even if you knew the owner and knew that the pit was friendly and wouldn't harm anyone??

    ReplyDelete
  16. You didn't answer this question...

    ReplyDelete
  17. Didn't answer this question either...

    ReplyDelete
  18. From: http://www.workingpitbull.com/aboutpits.htm


    Truth # 1

    Like any species, not all members of a dog breed act alike. There is no "one way" an American pit bull "acts". The members of any dog breed are neither all "nice" or "mean". The behavior of any domestic dog is a complex mixture of hard-wired genetics, environmental influence and human management.

    Almost all dog breeds have been selected for the purposes of hunting, guarding or protecting/working livestock. Before they worked for us, the dog's ancestors were wild animals. They retain the behaviors which make survival as a wild, pack living animal possible.

    Members of specific dog breeds tend to display specific behaviors selected for by man for thousands of years. Terriers dig to kill rodents, hounds trail animals with intent to kill, bird dogs live to chase, flush and retrieve dead birds, sled dogs run, greyhounds chase small animals with intent to kill, border collies chase, bark and bite and bulldogs grip firmly what they are encouraged to grip.

    ReplyDelete
  19. From: http://www.workingpitbull.com/aboutpits.htm


    Truth # 5

    The temperament which is considered "correct type" for an American pit bull - like the majority of purpose bred breeds - is not the best choice if your goal is a casual pet for romps at the local dog park. The pit bull is a working breed and demands much more time, energy, commitment and respect from their owners than a "generic" dog with exhibits little character.

    Having said that, any breed experiences a wide range of temperaments, and there are always a percentage of "generic" pit bulls; lazy, couch potato sorts with no desire to work or play hard. A good rescue or long time breeder can match you with the pit bull that best fits the amount of commitment you wish to give to your pet. Generally speaking, most dog rescue groups gravitate toward "easy" pit bulls, those who do not really display the challenges associated with "breed type". Therefore, a rescue can be a fantastic place to shop for your first American pit bull.

    "Typical" American pit bulls are tough and intelligent animals, historically bred for a willingness to test their mettle against larger and stronger animals and against each other. It is not uncommon for an adult pit bull to be very quarrelsome toward other dogs while being very friendly to humans, and to expect him to be otherwise is unfair to the dog, to yourself and to the community in which you live. Some dog on dog aggression, intelligently handled, is a small price to pay for the attributes of a well bred bulldog.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Truth # 6

    With people, American pit bulls are one of - if not the most - friendliest and most loving breeds. Their pain tolerance makes them tolerant of children's rough play, and their confidence gives them a temperament owner's don't need to make excuses for. They are not a barky breed - many are not even good watch dogs - because they like people.

    Those who know pit bulls know that they greet friend and stranger alike with the usual "bully grin" and wiggling butt. A pit bull which snaps or snarls at people is NOT representative of the breed and behavior like that is indicative of poor genetics. Serious breeders cull (euthanized) animals which display poor temperament in order to help maintain the high standard that historical breeders have handed us.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Truth # 7

    Some people think that American pit bulls are "only good for fighting". Nothing could be further from the truth, either in opinion nor fact!

    The pit bull's roots are as a working "catch" dog and from this they developed into animals which controlled domestic hogs and bulls. Competitions to see which butcher had the better dog developed into the "baiting sports".

    Baiting and dog fighting have been illegal for many years now. The future of this versatile breed looks bright, as the dogs are adapting themselves to a variety of sports and work.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Truth # 8

    Because a dog attacks other animals does not mean that animal will attack humans (including children). It is a myth that once a dog has attacked another dog (or killed a chicken, etc) that "next time it could be a child".

    Many working breeds have antipathy towards other animals - coonhounds go mad at the sight of a raccoon, foxhounds will not hesitate to tear a dog-like fox to shreds, greyhounds and other sight hounds live to chase and maul rabbits and will eagerly kill cats. They are still used today to chase down and slaughter coyotes. Even the ever-friendly beagle will "murder" a rabbit, given the chance. And yet the greyhound, coon and foxhound and beagle are among the friendliest of breeds towards humans. And it is the same with the well bred pit bulldog.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Don't need to....I"ve said all I'm going to say and that's pits should and need to be destroyed. They are a menace to society...like drunk drivers and drug dealers....

    ReplyDelete
  24. Did YOU read everything I just posted?? Obviously not...

    ReplyDelete
  25. Sorry but that's just ignorant to me...

    ReplyDelete
  26. You do need to or you're just spouting off BS in my book...

    Show some facts that ALL pitbulls are killers, PLEASE!

    ReplyDelete
  27. Nope, not ignorant....just plain smart.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I don't need to read it because it's all written by people that support and defend a killer breed.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Sorry Anne....didn't mean to have a war of words on your blog. I've been called ignorant and an ass but that's ok...I will always defend MY opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  30. You are being ignorant... All you are stating is YOUR OPINION... You refuse to show any proof that ALL PITBULLS ARE KILLERS... You know why?? Because you CAN'T PROVE IT!!!

    Show me proof, fact, a website that states it, PLEASE!

    ReplyDelete
  31. And I am defending my opinion as well... I did NOT call you an ass... Show me where in my comments that I did as much...

    ReplyDelete
  32. OKAY dare I speak my opinion.... I guess I will. I believe there are many lines within certain breeds that have been breed to do unimaginable things. That does not make the entire breed guilty of these behaviors. What makes these behaviors worse are the people with no true intelligence keeping them as pets or as objects.

    Personally, I am all for making owners totally responsible. Even if it went so far as to have requirements to owning these so called "dangerous" breeds. Maybe, someone who wanted to own a dog on this list having to take a series of classes and being licensed to own. I may not agree with tripling insurance because of a dog, but look it is your insurance that is going to cover a persons bill if they are attacked. If you don't have that insurance or the money in the bank account, then who pays all those medical bills? Therefore I could understand insurance asking for more money. I know there are ways to get the costs down. Like many areas have dog good citizenship training, etc.

    People want pets, they need to become responsible pet owners. They need to know what they are getting themselves into, and never underestimate what their pet is capable of doing (believe me I have seen some pretty horrific Chihuahua bites causing more damaging than one can imagine from them).

    To sum it up, not all dogs in a breed are evil, and yes people have something to do with their behaviors and ultimately should have all the responsibilities.

    ReplyDelete
  33. At the risk of getting blasted re: the argument here in the comments....

    I remember years back when the same arguement was raging over dobermans. I got a dboe who was supposedly "viscious" he was locked in a garage and left to die because the owner could not take the dog to a new town which had banned them.

    That dog was shy and skittish to be sure and a bit food aggressive having been starved. A bit of love, care, and continued attention to feeding and training and that dog was the MOST lovable dog around. he went to a family with a bunch of kids and that dog never ever was the least aggressive. he let those kids love and climb all over him.

    Likewise every single pit bull I have had the pleasure to meet has been the most biggest lugs of love ever. They are a big dog, they can be very dangerous if someone trains them to be but then again so can ANY dog.

    That is still no reason to destroy a breed.

    Studies show that 87.5% of violence is commited by ONE breed yet that breed continues to not only be revered but encouraged to procreate.... that breed? Male humans.

    ReplyDelete
  34. I totally agree with this.

    There should be a law that if you want to own a 'dangerous' breed that you should have to take classes and become knowledgeable about that breed. The only thing would be, who will deem what breed is dangerous and what breed isn't?

    ReplyDelete
  35. Goes to show that not ALL pit bulls are killers...

    ReplyDelete
  36. This is called personal liability.


    Personally I expect the owner to be responsible no matter what kind of dog they have. Does it really matter if you are attacked by a schnauzer or a german shepard? Not so much.

    ReplyDelete
  37. No, it doesn't matter what the breed is because there are 'mean' dogs in all breeds

    ReplyDelete
  38. I dont know why but dog fighting dosent seem to happen as much here, but you are right, its wrong sick and inhumane no matter where you live.

    ReplyDelete
  39. I agree it shouldn't matter, but certain breeds do have features that make their attacks much more dangerous...like locking jaws.

    ReplyDelete
  40. There already breeds list in these categories. Some places outlaw them completely. Some require dog training. As mentioned earlier, insurances raise rates...there is a list available.

    ReplyDelete

  41. Ok...

    First f all my thanks to everyone, and then to say...

    Wow, I picked a fine time to not come back online yesterday, and then to oversleep.
    I have now gotten pretty lost in your various links...

    Will be back in a minute to state my own humble opinions. (I promise). hehehe

    Love to all

    XOXO
    Me

    ReplyDelete
  42. My turn now...

    There are way too many ways to look at this. (Any lawyer worth his salt will tell you that).

    1. You can look at it as though aggression is the owners fault. ie: lack of proper training and/or socialization

    2. You can look at it as though it is an innate part of the type of dog (breed).

    OR, you can look at it as my dad always said when a news report would come out about a baby or a small child being mauled to death.

    I PROMISE THAT HIS OWN WORDS ARE MORE STRIKING THAN ANYTHING YOU WILL EVER FIND ONLINE.

    He would simply state (that, which we ALL forget all too easily).
    "A dog is an animal, what the hell do people expect?"

    That said, watch your dogs- Big, little, and every size inbetween.
    Dogs DO have feelings- To bring another person (whether 50 or newborn) into its environment without any type of preconditioning is asking for trouble.
    50 year olds generally require stitches.
    Newborns require coffins no matter the size of the dog.

    What kind of dog would I rather be up against?
    Depends on the dog.
    (Oh I have begun my own little can of worms)?
    Not really.

    As a whole I would rather be up against a larger dog. By simple way of their ability to reason.

    As far as the bites go...
    I would rather be bit by a large dog- (Provided it is only once).

    I have always equated dogs with knives.
    Big dogs are sharp knives.
    Little dogs are butter knives.
    And we do all know that butter knives do more damage than a well honed sharp knife.

    I do not trust my children/grandchildren with ANY dog.
    I do not care how long I have known that dog, or if he/she is my own dog or not.
    Never have. Never will.

    Dad's words have remained with me through the years.
    A dog is an animal.
    Therefore if its territory OR its happiness is threatened, real or perceived, it will always BE that animal, (and to hell with all the books, the trainers and the owners etc).
    There are NO guarantees.
    Their DNA is canine, and not human.

    We forget too easily when they become only our 'pets'.
    For some reason, the word 'pet' has become akin to 'toy'.
    Sadly, neither is true.

    Dogs are dogs.
    Trust not a strangers dog.
    Trust your own dog even less.

    XOXO
    Anne

    ReplyDelete

  43. This also applies to another animal; whether dog, cat, etc etc etc...

    ReplyDelete
  44. That's the point I've been trying to make.....thank you. Your dad was a very smart man!

    ReplyDelete
  45. As soon as I read the first line I knew what it was about and I couldn't read on. People that do this to dogs should get treated the same way as they did to the dogs when the Police catch them. They don't even deserve to live!

    ReplyDelete
  46. Dad was absolutely smart!
    (And I still miss him terribly you know)...

    He had Prince- A german shepherd, before he married Mom.

    Historically, a German Shepherd is a "one~man~dog".
    At any rate, (and damn every argument above), "Prince" filled that definition.
    Mom was big enough to stand up to the dog- (or so they thought)-

    Mom didn't like him.
    He didn't like her.
    They kept their distance from each other.

    BUT, he was an excellent cattle dog for them, and so he stayed.
    Prince was an outside dog, so no problems within.

    7+ years later, my sister Mary came along.
    A year later she was walking with help.

    One day as Mom was holding Marys hand and walking out to the barn, Prince pushed Mary out of the way, nuzzling up to Mom.

    Dad saw it.

    That is all it took for him.
    Dad brought Prince to Vickerys, and that was that.

    Given the choice of a daughter or a dog, he was taking NO chance, especially aware of the history between Mom and Prince.

    It would not have mattered to Dad what kind of dog he was, (ie big little or inbetween). Or whether he was a pit bull or a toy collie.
    Fact was, there was a greater perceived potential for a major problem.

    Did Dad cold heartedly get rid of his very faithful dog?
    Not a chance. What the story tells is of a greater love.
    But then that would dictate an owners responsibility. And not the breed.
    Pa stepped up to that proverbial plate when push literally came to shove.

    Last but not least, and again, they are animals.
    ALL came from the wild.
    As we did also.

    XOXO
    Me

    ReplyDelete

  47. Sweet Steph;
    You are very right- We can only hope that karma, somehow WILL catch up to all of the Michael Vicks of the world

    XOXO
    Me

    ReplyDelete
  48. Pit Bull Cruelty

    In recent years, pit bulls have gained more than just a foothold in the public awareness. Unscrupulous breeding and negative media attention have resulted in many apartment complexes, neighborhoods and even counties imposing bans on the breed, citing them as "inherently dangerous" to the public.

    But did you know that Pit Bulls were actually bred to be trustworthy and friendly to people? These dogs actually earned the nickname "nursemaid's dog," because they were so reliable with young children.

    Continued below...

    ReplyDelete
  49. My daughter has a nine year old Pit named Deuce. He has no idea what his teeth are for. Her husband's cousin raised Deuce from a 4 week old pup. Because Les lived in Cincinnati OH, he had to take Deuce to training, get him tattoo'ed on the inside of his thigh and get a tracking chip in his ear. Deuce is now in Richmond IN and is on file with RPD as being a "friendly" pit bull. All his numbers and his temperment are on file also. I trust Deuce with my G-children more than I do with my husband's mixed breed Cinnamon. Cinnamon is protective of Rick and doesn't tolerate fast movments around him.

    ReplyDelete
  50. In Richmond if a pit is not on file with RPD and they are seen loose they will be shot. No questions asked. If a pit goes to the shelter, it will be euthanized, no attempt at placement.

    ReplyDelete
  51. And you kept arguing that it wasn't the dogs fault but the owners/breeders. I was merely stating that is the point I was trying to get across but you kept the argument going. Yes, I said that they need to be banned and destroyed and I sill and will always stand by that. It is in their blood AND DNA to attack.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Sorry Anne but I'm tired of trying to defend my point of view.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Nope, I said, "I believe there are many lines within certain breeds that have been breed to do unimaginable things. That does not make the entire breed guilty of these behaviors. What makes these behaviors worse are the people with no true intelligence keeping them as pets or as objects. "

    This does not solely lay the behaviors on the owners. I do think that if you are going to have a pet you should be completely responsible for their behaviors. Which was also in that same comment.

    Please do not tell me what I kept arguing if you aren't going bother reading what I said in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Oh but I did read it....every single one of them....

    ReplyDelete

  55. Not only for you, but for everyone...

    There is NEVER a need to apologize within my comments for your own point(s) of view.
    Well unless you attack me. hehehe J/K

    XOXO
    me


    ReplyDelete
  56. That's assumptions... Not opinions....

    I'm just saying...

    ReplyDelete
  57. AMEN!!!

    That's what I was trying to say... only didn't do as well of a job... And it took me 17,000 words to do so...

    THANK YOU!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  58. I just want to say, Casey you worded things very well. I think many people were trying to say the same thing, we just aren't as talented.

    ReplyDelete
  59. My upbringing and my neighborhood are/was very good. Everyone has taken this to a whole other level where it DID NOT need to go. I AM NOT AN ANIMAL! I do not nor will I ever consider humans animals...except those that hurt children. Given that, are you saying that a child molestor can be rehabilitated? I think not...once a molester always a molester...I know what I know and I believe what I believe. What's next? Accuse me of animal cruelty because I eat meat? Been there, done that and that person is no longer on my list.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Well that's NOT what YOU said... YOU said to kill the whole BREED... Not ONCE did you state anything like what Anne's Dad said...

    ReplyDelete
  61. Honestly I think YOU are taking things to another level...

    ReplyDelete
  62. *applauds*

    Thank you Casey for stating what I could not find the words for...

    ReplyDelete
  63. No.

    I DO think it's cruel that you want an entire breed wiped out for what a handful do. If a little Yorkie attacked would you want THAT whole breed wiped out also??

    ReplyDelete
  64. I truly do believe that God has a special plan for people that were mean and abusive to animals, the elderly and small children. We were to told to take care of them and Yikes I do not to be one of the people that he turns his Justice on for cruelty to the weak. How can you possible trust a abuser? Actually why would you want to in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Wow, this one sure is a can of worms.

    I personally have been around many very sweet pit bulls. One lives across the street, she has allowed us into her yard when her owners were not around, has played with our dogs and is better behaved than my dogs.
    I do insist on getting to know a dog myself before allowing or forbidding my children to go near them.
    It is no guarantee that you are 100% safe with any dog, You learn how to assess their personality and disposition and make the personal decision as to whether they are a good choice for you to socialize with.
    I groomed dogs professionally for 3 years and know from experience how any breed could be extremely aggressive. I was viciously attacked by a Lasa Apso just for putting my hand out to get to know it when the owner brought him into the grooming shop. He clamped onto my fingers and would not let go, swinging his whole body vigorously back and forth trying to rip them out of joint. His owners had to beat him to get him to let go. I found out later that he had been banned from every grooming shop he had ever been to.
    I do have to say that the shop I worked at would not accept Chow's because so many groomers had been attacked by the few that were customers. Probably had to make it a rule for all to keep the bad apples away.

    When we bought our house the insurance agency had a long list of dogs that they would not cover and asked us not to own. "Liabilities". One was a German Shepard....we bought one from a rescue labeled a mix, but she looks all shepard to most. She is the biggest sissy on 4 legs.

    Would I own a Pit? Yes. Would I take one in off the street and keep it while my children are SMALL, probably not. It's a roll of dice...and we all have our limits.

    Now on the subject of declawing. When I was 11 I brought home a kitten. My parents reluctantly let me keep it. Despite a menagerie of scratching posts he insisted on shredding the upholstery on my mothers prize antique chair. He was soon declawed so that we could keep him. He was a very laid back and happy cat. Spoiled like crazy. He often walked on very narrow railings and never lost his balance. He always let me play with his feet and never seemed sensitive about them. Maybe he was the exception to the rule, but he didnt seem a victim of cruelty.

    Tail docking? I had a boxer for 10 years (my first born, I call him). His tail was snipped before I got him. I never had his ears done...I never liked that. I must confess, with as hyper as he was....I never missed his tail. I know it sounds cruel, but I'll never complain about that one.

    I hope I havent stirred the pot at all. I do believe that dog personalities and human personalities can either compliment or endanger one another. We can make our own choices without judging the whole breed.

    ReplyDelete