[My] Life in Wisconsin

Turn Up the Heat on the Insurance Industry, Lobbying Database & 10 Reasons



This? Is Christian????



Click above or go here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fq9G44tomKY


That's a MINISTER in The U.S.A. ?!?
You have GOT to be kidding!



Are you as sickened as I am?!?





Ben Cohen
Editor of The Daily Banter.com
Posted: August 24, 2009 04:18 AM

10 Reasons We Need a Public Option

It has become increasingly clear that the president and the Democratic Party have done a poor job of articulating why we need a public option in the next health care bill. The Republicans and centrist Democrats have successfully managed to dictate the terms of debate, casting the push for a public insurance option as an obsession of the far Left. Progressives will have to fight very hard to keep any form of the public option included in the final health care package, and its strength will be determined by the Left's ability to pressure Obama.

Real health care reform cannot happen without a public option, and we need a constant reminder of exactly what we are fighting for.

The top 10 reasons why there MUST be a public insurance option:


   1. Passing health care reform with a public option means millions of currently uninsured people will get access to comprehensive coverage at an affordable rate.

   2. A public option will force private insurance companies to compete with the power of the government. Prices will come down, and they will no longer be able to charge insane premiums or deny coverage.

   3. A public option gives power to consumers who can walk away from insurance companies that do not pay out, deny coverage, or excessively increase their premiums.

   4. It will give Americans a sense of ownership of health care. It will no longer be a privilege of the rich, but an affordable part of everyone's life and a comfort in times of crisis.

   5. With a public option, drug prices will come down due to the government's ability to negotiate with pharmaceutical companies.

   6. It will prevent people from going bankrupt because of excessive medical bills. According to the National Coalition on Health Care, "62 percent of all bankruptcies filed in 2007 were linked to medical expenses. Of those who filed for bankruptcy, nearly 80 percent had health insurance."

   7. A public plan will have significantly lower overheads than a private plan. The government won't need to market their plan, and they don't need to make a profit from it. Therefore, the the consumer reaps the savings.

   8. It will save small businesses huge amounts of money and allow them to raise wages, increase vacation time and take better care of their employees.

   9. After a few years, it will prove Republicans totally and utterly wrong about socialized medical care.

  10. Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Sarah Palin will have very visible and hilarious meltdowns.



      What could be better than that?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lobbying Database
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



Turn Up the Heat on the Insurance Industry

It is time for health care reformers to turn up the heat on the major obstacle to Congress passing a good policy -- the private insurance industry.

Few Americans know the names of the nation's largest health insurance companies or their CEOs.
That has to change, quickly.


The political muscle of the insurance industry is the major reason that seven conservative Democratic Senators -- led by Max Baucus (Montana) and including Blanche Lincoln (Arkansas), Kent Conrad (North Dakota), Jeff Bingaman (New Mexico), Ben Nelson (Nebraska), Mary Landrieu (Louisiana), and Arlen Specter (Pennsylvania) -- are blocking President Obama's proposal for a public option to compete with the private insurance companies.


Here is a list of the country's largest health insurance companies, according to Fortune magazine.
They are: United Health Care Group, WellPoint, Aetna, Humana, Cigna, HealthNet, Coventry Health Care, WellCare Health Plans, Universal America, Amerigroup, Centene, Molina Healthcare, Medical Mutual of Ohio, and HealthSpring.

Anyone can click on each corporation's website and find the names and affiliations of the companies' boards of directors, including their CEOs, as well as the addresses of their headquarters -- in case anyone is interested in organizing a protest rally. Anyone can go to the Center for Responsive Politics website and find out how much each company's PAC and employees spend on influence-peddling, and which members of Congress received the industry's largesse. Wait a few paragraphs and we'll start naming names.

As Obama recently said in his weekly radio and YouTube address: "Every time we come close to passing health insurance reform, the special interests fight back with everything they've got. They use their influence. They use their political allies to scare and mislead the American people. They start running ads. This is what they always do." He said that the current health care system "works better for the insurance industry than it does for the American people." We need, he insisted, to "pass health insurance reform that finally holds the insurance companies accountable."

The right-wing fanatics who are disrupting the town meetings are a diversion. These Limbaugh lunatics would never vote for Baucus or any other conservative Democrats, whether they support Obama's plan or not. But by creating a ruckus, lying about Obama's plan (calling it "socialism" and warning that it would create "death panels"), and getting more media attention than they deserve, these Republican extremists are doing the insurance industry's dirty work. In fact, there's evidence that the insurance industry is funding some of these right-wing groups to cause chaos.

In a recent cover story, Business Week declared that the industry industry has "already won" the health reform battle, but that assessment is premature. The majority of Americans want health care reform and don't trust the private insurance industry.

President Obama, and the major grassroots groups that are pushing for reform -- including faith-based organizations, unions, community groups, netroots groups like MoveOn, and Organizing for America, the organization formed by Obama's campaign volunteers -- can still win the fight if they focus public attention on the insurance industry and their lackeys in Congress. And George Lakoff, the well-known linguist and political advisor, has provided reformers with a new way to frame the debate to put the industry and the Baucus Caucus on the defensive.

So let's pay attention to the health insurance industry behind the curtain.

This year alone, the industry has spent over $34 million to hire 923 lobbyists to influence Congress, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. The industry has also spent almost $16 million in campaign contributions in the past two years.

The industry's trade association, called America's Health Insurance Plans, is one of the country's most powerful lobby groups, representing almost 1,300 corporations. Although health insurance companies compete with each other for customers, they work together -- through this lobby group -- when it comes to resisting government rules that require them to be more efficient and socially responsible. This year alone, America's Health Insurance Plans has already spent $3.9 million in lobbying, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Its Washington, D.C. headquarters is at 601 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, South Building Suite 500. Its board is comprised of the CEOs of the largest health insurance corporations.

During her campaign for president, then-Senator Hillary Clinton accurately observed that insurance companies "spend tens of billions of dollars a year figuring out how not to cover people" and "how to cherry-pick the healthiest persons, and leave everyone else out in the cold."

What does the industry want? The big health insurance companies actually want the federal government to require every American to have health insurance. That would expand its customer base. The industry would also like the government to provide subsidies for people and families who can't afford insurance. To get that, the industry is willing to live with one of Obama's key selling points -- a ban on insurance industry discrimination against sick people, especially those with "pre-existing" conditions.

What do they object to?
What the insurance companies don't want is another key component of Obama 's plan -- a "public option" that would compete with them for customers and provide Americans with more choices.

A public option would provide insurance for those who don't get it from employers or can't afford private premiums -- similar to the current Medicare program for seniors.
The high cost of U.S. health care is due in large measure to the outrageous greed and costly inefficiencies of the insurance industry that requires so much paperwork that its bloated administrative costs push up the cost of premiums, compared with the much lower administrative costs of Medicare.
By competing with the private insurance companies, a public option would keep them honest.

Not surprisingly, the health insurance industry has been exercising its political muscle to thwart a public option. Not a single Senate Republican supports a public option. But Obama doesn't need any Republican votes if he can get all 60 Senate Democrats, and most Democrats in the House, to support his plan.

The insurance industry knows that, too. That's why, according to a recent report by the Center for Responsive Politics, and a recent article in the Washington Post, the industry has focused much of its campaign contributions -- America's version of legalized bribery -- on the conservative Democrats in Congress known as the Blue Dogs.

The industry has been particularly generous to Baucus, the Montana Democrat who chairs the Senate Finance Committee that is drafting a version of the legislation. According to the Washington Post, Baucus "has emerged as a leading recipient of Senate campaign contributions from the hospitals, insurers and other medical interest groups hoping to shape the legislation to their advantage. Health-related companies and their employees gave Baucus's political committees nearly $1.5 million in 2007 and 2008, when he began holding hearings and making preparations for this year's reform debate."

In 1993, when President Clinton proposed an overhaul of the health care system, the insurance industry was the visible opponent of reform, running the infamous "Harry and Louise" television ads that warned of a government takeover that would get between patients and their doctors. They used their political clout to derail any reform.

Today, the situation is much worse. Many more Americans (at least 47 million) have no health insurance, because many employers have stopped providing it for employees, because families can't afford the cost of premiums, or because insurance companies won't offer it to people with "pre-existing" health conditions. In addition, many more Americans who do have insurance discover that it doesn't cover many things they need and forces them to make costly out-of-pocket expenses. Not surprisingly, health care costs are the nation's number one cause of personal bankruptcies.

What would it mean to expose and target the health insurance industry?

Let's look, for example, at WellPoint, the nation's second-largest health insurance corporation. With a few clicks, you can discover that last year WellPoint had profits of $2.5 billion. WellPoint's headquarters is located at 120 Monument Circle in Indianapolis. Its corporate phone number is (317)488-6000.

This year WellPoint has spent over $2.4 million in lobbying, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. WellPoint's parent, Blue Cross/Blue Shield, has spent over $9.5 million to lobby Congress. In the last two years, WellPoint's political action committee made $1.8 million in campaign contributions to Republicans, Democrats, and other lobby groups, including $3,900 to Baucus. In addition, WellPoint employees -- mostly its top executives, including CEO Angela Braly -- contributed over $154,000 to Congressional candidates in the past two years.

The 17 members of the WellPoint board of directors have a web of corporate and political connections that supplements the company's campaign contributions and lobbying expenditures.

Angela Braly is WellPoint's CEO. She was paid $4.2 million last year. Braly also serves on the board of America's Health Insurance Plans, the powerful lobby group.

Larry C. Glasscock, the prior CEO, still serves as chairman of WellPoint's board and is also a director of Sprint Nextel (the giant telecommunications corporation) and Zimmer Holdings (an Indiana-based manufacturer of orthopaedic products).

Susan Bayh is a former attorney with the giant Indianapolis-based drug company Eli Lilly & Company. She is also a director of Curis (a drug company), Dendreon (a biotechnology company), Dyax (a biopharmaceutical company), and Emmis (a media corporation that owns radio stations and magazines). In the last two years, according to the Indianapolis Star, she has earned over $2 million serving on the boards of these health care corporations. She also happens to be the wife of Evan Bayh, the Democratic Senator from Indiana. Sen. Bayh recently told an Indiana newspaper that he is an "agnostic" regarding the public option. That means he's sitting on the fence, trying to decide which side he's on -- the insurance industry or the majority of people of Indiana.

Donald W. Riegle Jr is another WellPoint director with political connections. He is a former Democratic Senator from Michigan (1976-1995). Since 2001 he has been chairman of government relations for APCO Worldwide, a DC-based lobbying firm, and was also, until earlier this month, a director of Stillwater Mining Company, based in Montana, Baucus' home state.

William H. T. Bush, a WellPoint director since 2004, is chairman of the board of Bush-O'Donnell & Company, a St. Louis-based investment management firm. He is the younger brother of former President George H.W. Bush, and the uncle of former President George W. Bush

William G. Mays is the CEO of Mays Chemical Company, based in Indianapolis. He is also on the board of Vectren, an energy company that covers Indiana and Ohio.

Ramiro Peru is CFO of Saint Corporation, a holding company of Swift Transportation Co., and previously CFO of Phelps Dodge, a mining company. Peru is also a director of Tucson Electric Power Co., and Unisource Energy Services, a utility based in Arizona.

Warren Jobe, like Peru, is on the boards of both WellPoint and Unisource. Until his 2001 retirement, Jobe's day job was senior VP of Southern Company, a huge Atlanta-based utility. He is also on the board of the Atlanta-based HomeBanc Corp. and chairman of the board of trustees of Oglethorpe University.

William Ryan is CEO of Banknorth, a Massachusetts-based financial services company. He serves as the director of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Maine, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston, and Maine Machine Products.

Victor S. Liss, retired CEO and now vice chairman) of Trans-Lux Corporation (an electronics company), also serves on the boards of BNC Financial Group, the Bank of Fairfield and Honey Hill Care Center (nursing care facility) and a trustee of Norwalk Hospital in Connecticut.

Jackie M. Ward sits on the boards of the Bank of America, SYSCO (a Houston-based food company), Flowers Foods, and Sanmina-SCI Corporation (a San Jose-based global electronics company). She served as CEO of Computer Generation Inc .

George A. Schaefer Jr., , retired last year as chairman of the board of Directors of Fifth Third Bancorp, based Cincinnati, Ohio. He sits on the board of Ashland, a chemical company based in Covington, Kentucky.

Sheila Burke, a professor at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, who served in the George W. Bush adminstration and also sits on the board of the Chubb Corporation, one of the nation's largest property and casualty insurance companies.

John Zuccotti, is co-chairman of Brookfield Properties, a real estate firm based in Toronto, and senior counsel of Weil, Gotshal and Manges, a global corporate law firm based in New York City. He also sits on the board of Emigrant Savings Bank and the Dreyfus Investment Corporation.

Julie Hill (a California real estate entrepreneur), Jane Pisano (president of the Natural History Museum in Los Angeles and former executive of the University of Southern California), and Lenox Baker, Jr. (a cardiac and thoracic surgeon and president of Mid-Atlantic Cardiothoracic Surgeons, Ltd. in Norfolk, Virginia) also sit on the WellPoint board.

These individuals -- and their counterparts on the boards of the other major private health insurance companies -- are not evil people. Many serve on the boards of various charities and are civic leaders in their communities.

But in their roles as board members of WellPoint, they serve the interests of the nation's second largest private health insurance company and thus against the interests of the majority of Americans who want and need health insurance reform.

A few hundred people serve on the boards of the nation's largest health insurance companies.

As President Obama noted, they, the industry they serve, and the politicians who do their bidding, need to be held accountable.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Howard Dean, CLICK HERE
  • TWO TERM GOVERNOR OF VERMONT,
  • PRESIDENT OF THE DNC (which fueled the biggest Democratic win, in the presidential race, the House and the Senate, since LBJ,)
  • Himself a doctor.
  • His wife a practicing doctor.
  • Listen. HE IS AN EXPERT ON HEALTH CARE!!

It has GOT to mean something!


XOXO
Me


PS
Please read these top two comments before commenting.


PPS
New "Life in Flintville" blog to post shortly...

I promise...





11 comments:

  1. And here's a list (for regular email)... PLEASE EMAIL THEM IMMEDIATELY!

    Our "holdouts"

    tessa.gould@mail.house.gov, john.zody@mail.house.gov, dean.mitchell@mail.house.gov, pia.carusone@mail.house.gov, kate.haas@mail.house.gov, trish.reilly@mail.house.gov, meg.joseph@mail.house.gov, scott.fairchild@mail.house.gov, peter.chandler@mail.house.gov, donna.pignatelli@mail.house.gov, susan.mcavoy@mail.house.gov, ron.carleton@mail.house.gov, denis.fleming@mail.house.gov, melanie.morris@mail.house.gov, stacey.alexander@mail.house.gov, brad.morris@mail.house.gov, april.metwali@mail.house.gov, lisa.quigley@mail.house.gov, ashley.jones@mail.house.gov, phyllis.hallmon@mail.house.gov, beecher.frasier@mail.house.gov, chad.causey@mail.house.gov, jason.buckner@mail.house.gov, matt.walker@mail.house.gov, drew.goesl@mail.house.gov, hayden.rogers@mail.house.gov, angela.kouters@mail.house.gov, sharon.wheeler@mail.house.gov, joe.bonfiglio@mail.house.gov, mark.brownell@mail.house.gov, tim.mccann@mail.house.gov, sam.marchio@mail.house.gov, linda.macias@mail.house.gov, vickie.walling@mail.house.gov, howard.bauleke@mail.house.gov, stuart.chapman@mail.house.gov,
    rebecca.coleman@mail.house.gov, nichole.reynold@mail.house.gov, nichole.reynolds@mail.house.gov, scott.schloegel@mail.house.gov, sarah.benzing@mail.house.gov, drew.goesl@mail.house.gov, ms01ima@mail.house.gov, chad.causey@mail.house.gov, in09ima@mail.house.gov



    The commas are already in. All you need to do is copy, paste, and hit send!

    XOXO
    Me

    ReplyDelete

  2. Real Questions with REAL ANSWERS!


    Q: Which is higher: the number of Americans who watch American Idol, or the number of Americans who lack a usual source of healthcare?

    A: The number of Americans who lack a usual source of healthcare. 40 million people report that they do not have a usual source of healthcare while 25 to 35 million people tune in to watch American Idol. People most likely to experience a barrier to a usual source of care are uninsured and in the lowest income brackets. Providing a usual source of care will cost the system less and ensure better health. Health reform is necessary to reduce disparities and provide all Americans with quality healthcare.



    Q: True or False. The majority of Americans with chronic conditions are below 65 years of age.

    A: True. While the majority of people with chronic conditions are under 65 years of age, the likelihood of having a chronic condition increases as you become older. The number of people with chronic conditions is rapidly increasing, and it is estimated that if we do not intervene now, by 2025 nearly half of the population will suffer from at least one chronic disease, imposing a large burden on the U.S. healthcare system. With health reform, a greater focus on prevention can help limit the number of chronic diseases Americans acquire before the age of 65.
    For more information on prevention please see Chronic Conditions.



    Q: True or False. Environmental conditions, social circumstances, or behavioral choices contribute relatively little to premature death in the United States.

    A: False. Nearly 60 percent of premature deaths in the U.S. are attributable to these factors, which could be addressed through investments in public health and prevention. We need comprehensive health reform that recognizes the opportunity for prevention to improve Americans’ health.
    For more information on prevention please see the Healthier America report.



    Q: True or False. The United States has the highest rate of preventable deaths among 19 other industrialized countries.

    A: True. A recent study supported by the Commonwealth Fund found that the United States ranked last among 19 other industrialized countries on preventable deaths. While the other countries significantly improved between the 1997-98 and 2002-03 study periods, the U.S. improved marginally on the measure. Health reform is needed to assure that preventive measures can be taken to avoid these unnecessary deaths.
    For more information on prevention please see the Commonwealth Fund report.



    Q: What is the economic benefit of providing health insurance to those currently uninsured?

    A: Insuring Americans currently without insurance would save between $75B and $125B per year or ¾ percent of GDP. Health reform is essential to protect American families from the increasing cost of care and assure all Americans high-quality affordable health care.
    For more information on how health reform will benefit businesses and save taxpayer dollars, please see The Economic Case for Health Reform.



    Q: True or False: If the United States continues on its current trajectory, in 30 years health care costs will account for one of every four dollars spent.

    A: False: If we continue on the same trajectory one of every THREE dollars we spend will go to health care. This is not sustainable for America’s economy; we cannot maintain the status quo. Health reform will help reduce the burden on businesses and will assure all Americans have high-quality affordable health care.
    For more information on the increasing cost of health care and its burden on the US economy please see The Economic Case for Health Reform.



    Q: Which is longer: the time primary care doctors spend on administrative work per week or two feature length films?

    A: The average primary care doctor spends four hours per week on administrative tasks – roughly the same amount of time it would take to watch two feature length films. Health reform will cut down on administrative costs by investing in Health IT and electronic medical records.
    For more on administrative

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'd be lying if I said I didn't see this (extremism) coming. Disgusting as it is. Worst thing is I doubt this "Pastor" would feel the least bit guilty if one of his parishioners killed the president, based on him telling them what he is praying for. Someone may say it was a calling.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anne, I still find it hard to believe how some people can claim to be Christian and then speak of hating to the point of wishing someone dead. That, to me, sounds more of a Muslim thing. Maybe that is what they should be instead. Wishing someone dead makes that person no better than the one with the evil ways of thinking.

    After all...that old saying..."Two wrongs don't make it right" would be right....right?

    And Anne, you know I am the first to have my hand up for agreeing with a public option. Having nothing, I know what it is to need and have to do without while the minor health problems in the mean time becomes a major health problem.

    The key is preventative medicine. Stop all these dammed food and drink ads on TV and tear down all these restaurant signs that show all these tempting pictures of things we don't need in our bodies. Maybe then, what is out of site will be out of mind and will eventually cause our fatter bodies to become leaner and healthier again.

    We have got to become a healthier nation again. Then maybe we can be a more productive nation.

    But Gosh darnit it all....it does appear that there are those who are doing all they can to stop our nation from having the things we need in order to be strong again.

    If something doesn't change soon, bad will only get worse.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I am praying for this public option, I am one who is falling between the cracks, you know my illnesses and my prognosis is not good for recovery on any of them ....yet....I am uninsured. I cannot find a health insurance who will cover me and my conditions. if Obama and thee American people do not push and pass for this public option I am just a statistic, another person who will die for lack of funds. its not fair, Ive worked hard my whole life my only crime , becoming ill? its a shame.

    ReplyDelete

  6. Blue Dogs Rake in the Dollars from the Health Care Industry …
    According to data from the Center for Responsive Politics
    The 20 Blue Dogs have taken a combined $6,849,273 from various segments of the health care industry,

    ReplyDelete
  7. Blue Dog Leadership Team
    from http://www.house.gov/


    Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (SD), Blue Dog Co-Chair for Administration
    Rep. Baron Hill (IN-09), Blue Dog Co-Chair for Policy
    Rep. Charlie Melancon (LA-03), Blue Dog Co-Chair for Communications
    Rep. Heath Shuler (NC-11), Blue Dog Whip

    Blue Dog Members

    Altmire, Jason (PA-04)
    Arcuri, Mike (NY-24)
    Baca, Joe (CA-43)
    Barrow, John (GA-12)
    Berry, Marion (AR-01)
    Bishop, Sanford (GA-02)
    Boren, Dan (OK-02)
    Boswell, Leonard (IA-03)
    Boyd, Allen (FL-02)
    Bright, Bobby (AL-02)
    Cardoza, Dennis (CA-18)
    Carney, Christopher (PA-10)
    Chandler, Ben (KY-06)
    Childers, Travis (MS-01)
    Cooper, Jim (TN-05)
    Costa, Jim (CA-20)
    Cuellar, Henry (TX-28)
    Dahlkemper, Kathy (PA-03)
    Davis, Lincoln (TN-04)
    Donnelly, Joe (IN-02)
    Ellsworth, Brad (IN-08)
    Giffords, Gabrielle (AZ-08)
    Gordon, Bart (TN-06)
    Griffith, Parker (AL-05)
    Harman, Jane (CA-36)
    Herseth Sandlin, Stephanie (SD)
    Hill, Baron (IN-09)
    Holden, Tim (PA-17)
    Kratovil, Jr., Frank (MD-01)
    McIntyre, Mike (NC-07)
    Marshall, Jim (GA-08)
    Matheson, Jim (UT-02)
    Melancon, Charlie (LA-03)
    Michaud, Mike (ME-02)
    Minnick, Walt (ID-01)
    Mitchell, Harry (AZ-05)
    Moore, Dennis (KS-03)
    Murphy, Patrick (PA-08)
    Nye, Glenn (VA-02)
    Peterson, Collin (MN-07)
    Pomeroy, Earl (ND)
    Ross, Mike (AR-04)
    Salazar, John (CO-03)
    Sanchez, Loretta (CA-47)
    Schiff, Adam (CA-29)
    Scott, David (GA-13)
    Shuler, Heath (NC-11)
    Space, Zack (OH-18)
    Tanner, John (TN-08)
    Taylor, Gene (MS-04)
    Thompson, Mike (CA-01)
    Wilson, Charles (OH-06)

    ReplyDelete
  8. OH MY GOOD GOD!!!!

    I can't believe this... I listened for a bit to his actual sermon that someone had taped and put up on YouTube and I canNOT believe what came out of this delusional pastor's mouth... Even when talking about a different religion he said that "Dikes" and "Fagots" run those churches... Told his congregation that if they didn't like those words they could get out... Said "gay" meant happy and shouldn't be associated with those people... Even said that Barney Franks is a PEDOPHILE!!!! He said the biggest hypocrite in the world are those who believe in the death penalty for murderers, but not for homosexuals... Because "God" commanded that the sodomites be killed and that's the same god that commanded that murderers be killed so we should just kill all gays/lesbians...

    This was all in the first couple of minutes... I couldn't stand to hear more so I shut it off...

    Like they said on MSNBC, he's playing with fire. BIGTIME!

    This is exactly how the suicide bombers in the middle east were started. You take a poor community that is stressed to the max and in that emotional state, they are extremely suggestible. Add one passionate dumbass that tells them that their "Higher Power" commands that they just go ahead and take out the ones who are forcing them to live like this... Of course they have to tell them that Americans, Obama, the government, whatever their target is, are the sole basis for ALL of their stress so that they really believe that. Then they tell them that those people should die, should be taken out... Then to eliminate the fear of danger, they tell them that even if they die while performing those acts, they will go to their form of heaven and be highly rewarded for their acts. They will live forever in luxury (and of course they want this and can think of nothing better...) And there you have it... An entire community of home-grown killing machines that will stop at nothing to get the job done...

    I just hope and pray that something is done to stop anything terrible from happening... Keep these people educated enough to see through the bullshit and not commit terrible crimes...

    Love you MUCH MUCH!
    ~CaseyAnne

    ReplyDelete
  9. I agree Sweet Oka,

    This extremism has been brewing up for multiple reasons and it was only a matter of time before someone saw this as an opportunity to brainwash people...

    I also think you're right about the Pastor. He would NOT feel guilty in the least bit. He has been trying to brainwash these people so much that after a while he believes it all as truth... Since he whole-heartedly thinks the things he is saying are right, then he would find no shame in one of his "people" carrying out those wishes... They do believe that "God" wants them to do it, not the pastor and that makes it right in their sick minds...

    I just hope no one tries anything... For their sake and for the government's sake...

    Love to you!
    ~Casey

    ReplyDelete
  10. Sweet Peachie,

    I'm sorry, but I have to disagree with your Muslim comment. Their religion doesn't preach to kill or hate anymore than Christianity does. They are very peaceful... However, they, too, have these extremists who try to twist the word of their form of Bible to meet their own personal goals... Not all Muslims are terrorists... It is NOT the religion, it is the individual's sick mind... I understand, however, how this line of thinking was brought about... Had a Christian done something like those terrorists did, we would call them terrorists because we know that's not what the religion is about... BUT the news put a HUGE emphasis on "Muslim" and that was wrong... Those killers didn't kill because of their religion. Some dipstick convinced them that killing was right and to do so told them that their "God" would reward them... They killed because they are brainwashed and evil... Not because they are Muslim...

    I do agree with how sickening this situation is... It's sad to hear people who profess to be true Christians doing these most Un-Christian things... Hate is hate and no matter where it is geared toward it is wrong. And like you said, "Two wrongs don't make a right"... Unfortunately this goes on all the time and the emotional state of our country is perfect breeding ground for sick people like this pastor to turn stressed people into killing machines... Just hope and pray nothing bad happens...

    Love you!!!
    ~Casey

    ReplyDelete
  11. Sweet Maiden,

    Unfortunately those who oppose this bill seem to be the ones with health coverage and who are doing well... Of course they don't want things to change because they don't desperately need them to change... It's sad, but you're right: our only crime is becoming ill. It's out of our control, not like we did this to ourselves, but yet we're expected to pay the ultimate price of our life because of it???

    Personally I think that those who are opposed to this are extremely selfish... Even if those types of people think purely selfishly, they would see that it WOULD in fact benefit them... Since they are already paying for the uninsured to get treatment, why pay 100% of it when they could have insurance and then payment would be only 20% or so...

    It's truly sad that those people have lost the ability to put themselves in other's situations... Empathy is totally gone and replaced with "ME ME ME"... I just PRAY that this goes through so people like you can be treated properly and can get the BEST care offered... You shouldn't have to suffer like that...

    Love you!
    ~Casey

    ReplyDelete