[My] Life in Wisconsin

Hypocrisy, Hyperbole, History, and Hatred


How many of us only wish we would have written this?

XOXO
Me

***

An open letter to conservatives


Dear Conservative Americans,

The years have not been kind to you. I grew up in a profoundly Republican home, so I can remember when you wore a very different face than the one we see now.  You've lost me and you've lost most of America.  Because I believe having responsible choices is important to democracy, I'd like to give you some advice and an invitation.

First, the invitation:  Come back to us.

Now the advice.  You're going to have to come up with a platform that isn't built on a foundation of cowardice: fear of people with colors, religions, cultures and sex lives that differ from your own; fear of reform in banking, health care, energy; fantasy fears of America being transformed into an Islamic nation, into social/commun/fasc-ism, into a disarmed populace put in internment camps; and more.  But you have work to do even before you take on that task.

Your party -- the GOP -- and the conservative end of the American political spectrum have become irresponsible and irrational.  Worse, it's tolerating, promoting and celebrating prejudice and hatred.  Let me provide some examples -- by no means an exhaustive list -- of where the Right as gotten itself stuck in a swamp of hypocrisy, hyperbole, historical inaccuracy and hatred.

If you're going to regain your stature as a party of rational, responsible people, you'll have to start by draining this swamp:

Hypocrisy

You can't flip out -- and threaten impeachment - when Dems use a parliamentary procedure (deem and pass) that you used repeatedly (more than 35 times in just one session and more than 100 times in all!), that's centuries old and which the courts have supported. Especially when your leaders admit it all.

You can't vote and scream against the stimulus package and then take credit for the good it's done in your own district (happily handing out enormous checks representing money that you voted against, is especially ugly) --  114 of you (at last count) did just that -- and it's even worse when you secretly beg for more.

You can't fight against your own ideas just because the Dem president endorses your proposal.

You can't call for a pay-as-you-go policy, and then vote against your own ideas.

Are they "unlawful enemy combatants" or are they "prisoners of war" at Gitmo? You can't have it both ways.

You can't carry on about the evils of government spending when your family has accepted more than a quarter-million dollars in government handouts.

You can't refuse to go to a scheduled meeting, to which you were invited, and then blame the Dems because they didn't meet with you.

You can't rail against using teleprompters while using teleprompters. Repeatedly.

You can't rail against the bank bailouts when you supported them as they were happening.

You can't be for immigration reform, then against it .

You can't enjoy socialized medicine while condemning it.

You can't flip out when the black president puts his feet on the presidential desk when you were silent about white presidents doing the same.  Bush.  Ford.

You can't complain that the president hasn't closed Gitmo yet when you've campaigned to keep Gitmo open.

You can't flip out when the black president bows to foreign dignitaries, as appropriate for their culture, when you were silent when the white presidents did the same. Bush.  Nixon. Ike. You didn't even make a peep when Bush held hands and kissed (on the mouth) leaders of countries that are not on "kissing terms" with the US.

You can't complain that the undies bomber was read his Miranda rights under Obama when the shoe bomber was read his Miranda rights under Bush and you remained silent.  (And, no, Newt -- the shoe bomber was not a US citizen either, so there is no difference.)

You can't attack the Dem president for not personally* publicly condemning a terrorist event for 72 hours when you said nothing about the Rep president waiting 6 days in an eerily similar incident (and, even then, he didn't issue any condemnation).  *Obama administration did the day of the event.

You can't throw a hissy fitsound alarms and cry that Obama freed Gitmo prisoners who later helped plan the Christmas Day undie bombing, when -- in fact -- only one former Gitmo detainee, released by Dick Cheney and George W. Bush, helped to plan the failed attack.

You can't condemn blaming the Republican president for an attempted terror attack on his watch, then blame the Dem president for an attempted terror attack on his.

You can't mount a boycott against singers who say they're ashamed of the president for starting a war, but remain silent when another singer says he's ashamed of the president and falsely calls him a Maoist who makes him want to throw up and says he ought to be in jail.

You can't cry that the health care bill is too long, then cry that it's too short.

You can't support the individual mandate for health insurance, then call it unconstitutional when Dems propose it and campaign against your own ideas.

You can't demand television coverage, then whine about it when you get it.  Repeatedly.

You can't praise criminal trials in US courts for terror suspects under a Rep president, then call it "treasonous" under a Dem president.

You can't propose ideas to create jobs, and then work against them when the Dems put your ideas in a bill.

You can't be both pro-choice and anti-choice.

You can't damn someone for failing to pay $900 in taxes when you've paid nearly $20,000 in IRS fines.

You can't condemn criticizing the president when US troops are in harms way, then attack the president when US troops are in harms way , the only difference being the president's party affiliation (and, by the way, armed conflict does NOT remove our right and our duty as Americans to speak up).

You can't be both for cap-and-trade policy and against it.

You can't vote to block debate on a bill, then bemoan the lack of  'open debate'.

If you push anti-gay legislation and make anti-gay speeches, you should probably take a pass on having gay sex, regardless of whether it's 2004 or 2010.  This is true, too, if you're taking GOP money and giving anti-gay rants on CNN.  Taking right-wing money and GOP favors to write anti-gay stories for news sites while working as a gay prostitute, doubles down on both the hypocrisy and the prostitution.  This is especially true if you claim your anti-gay stand is God's stand, too.

When you chair the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children, you can't send sexy emails to 16-year-old boys (illegal anyway, but you made it hypocritical as well).

You can't criticize Dems for not doing something you didn't do while you held power over the past 16 years, especially when the Dems have done more in one year than you did in 16.

You can't decry "name calling" when you've been the most consistent and outrageous at it. And the most vile.

You can't spend more than 40 years hating, cutting and trying to kill Medicare, and then pretend to be the defenders of Medicare

You can't praise the Congressional Budget Office when it's analysis produces numbers that fit your political agenda, then claim it's unreliable when it comes up with numbers that don't.

You can't vote for X under a Republican president, then vote against X under a Democratic president.  Either you support X or you don't. And it makes it worse when you change your position merely for the sake obstructionism.

You can't call a reconciliation out of bounds when you used it repeatedly.

You can't spend taxpayer money on ads against spending taxpayer money.

You can't condemn individual health insurance mandates in a Dem bill, when the mandates were your idea.

You can't demand everyone listen to the generals when they say what fits your agenda, and then ignore them when they don't.

You can't whine that it's unfair when people accuse you of exploiting racism for political gain, when your party's former leader admits you've been doing it for decades.

You can't portray yourself as fighting terrorists when you openly and passionately support terrorists.

You can't complain about a lack of bipartisanship when you've routinely obstructed for the sake of political gain -- threatening to filibuster at least 100 pieces of legislation in one session, far more than any other since the procedural tactic was invented -- and admitted it.  Some admissions are unintentional, others are made proudly. This is especially true when the bill is the result of decades of compromise between the two parties and is filled with your own ideas.

You can't question the loyalty of Department of Justice lawyers when you didn't object when your own Republican president appointed them.

You can't preach and try to legislate "Family Values" when you: take nude hot tub dips with teenagers (and pay them hush money); cheat on your wife with a secret lover and lie about it to the world; cheat with a staffer's wife (and pay them off with a new job); pay hookers for sex while wearing a diaper and cheating on your wife; or just enjoying an old fashioned non-kinky cheating on your wife; try to have gay sex in a public toilet; authorize the rape of children in Iraqi prisons to coerce their parents into providing information; seek, look at or have sex with children; replace a guy who cheats on his wife with a guy who cheats on his pregnant wife with his wife's mother;


Hyperbole

You really need to disassociate with those among you who:

History

If you're going to use words like socialismcommunism and fascism, you must have at least a basic understanding of what those words mean (hint: they're NOT synonymous!)

You can't cut a leading Founding Father out the history books because you've decided you don't like his ideas.

You cant repeatedly assert that the president refuses to say the word "terrorism" or say we're at war with terror when we have an awful lot of videotape showing him repeatedly assailing terrorism and using those exact words.

If you're going to invoke the names of historical figures, it does not serve you well to whitewash them. Especially this one.

You can't just pretend historical events didn't happen in an effort to make a political opponent look dishonest or to make your side look better. Especially these events. (And, no, repeating it doesn't make it better.)

You can't say things that are simply and demonstrably false: health care reform will not push people out of their private insurance and into a government-run program ; health care reform (which contains a good many of your ideas and very few from the Left) is a long way from "socialist utopia"; health care reform is not "reparations"; nor does health care reform create "death panels".

Hatred

You have to condemn those among you who:

Oh, and I'm not alone:  One of your most respected and decorated leaders agrees with me.

So, dear conservatives, get to work.  Drain the swamp of the conspiracy nuts, the bald-faced liars undeterred by demonstrable facts, the overt hypocrisy and the hatred.  Then offer us a calm, responsible, grownup agenda based on your values and your vision for America.  We may or may not agree with your values and vision, but we'll certainly welcome you back to the American mainstream with open arms.  We need you.

(Anticipating your initial response:  No there is nothing that even comes close to this level of wingnuttery on the American Left.)

Written by Russell King Update: removed the mouth kissing reference and tried to clean up spelling.

***

Yes, ALL of the links work.
Am wondering how many of us see ourselves more clearly?

Thank you StarfishRed for the link that directed me here.


photo


Please feel free to spread this blog. 
People are already receiving death threats because of our ignorance, and those that have posted lies, nay, ALL of the above, and more.
We have a tendency to just look the other way.
I promise that this girl will no longer do that.

XOXO
me



21 comments:

  1. wonderful :) standing and clapping

    ReplyDelete

  2. You do command a tenuous grasp of the English language.

    ReplyDelete

  3. Right?
    I loved every word- and still have to get through most of the links.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I can't read all of this, my eyes are starting to droop.....the ambien is kicking in! bath done, nigh nigh time now........

    ReplyDelete
  5. I say it like I see it. Now I can go on and waste a lot of my tenuous grasp of the English language and if it helps you I will. i think this person that wrote all of these words of full of hot air, needed to fill his space with words and still get paid. In the main time encouraging people that hate easily to do what they like doing best.Saying God awful things about people they do not know in order to feel better about themselves. Now you see that my one word answer was less hateful. And it gave you an excuse to try and make me feel less than I am. That did not work.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The person who wrote this did a lot of research and provided numerous examples to support their opinion. One doesn't have to say 'God awful things about people they don't know' in order to expose bad behavior. The bad behavior speaks for itself - loudly. Pointing out bad behavior is not hateful. If someone who behaves badly does not want to be noticed or talked about, they can always improve their behavior.

    ReplyDelete
  7. it was not the writer alone that I meant, the meanness in multiply is enlightening

    ReplyDelete
  8. and please look in the mirror first ;(

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'd have to agree with you on that one. I've seen quite a bit of mean lately.

    ReplyDelete
  10. those who look the other way are just as bad as those who spout the hate...

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anne, I am so very proud of you.. for your courage in supporting health care reform and for your intelligent read on the issues (I thought the reason people received an education was so that they could read and research these types of issues. You have.. and many who disagree with you have not).
    I cannot believe that we actually have people in this country who are willing to threaten to kill others over health care reform. I guess we finally get to see the true face of those opposing reason and good health care for all.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I just want to tell these people, so dough~headed as to actually believe the hate, the the ignorance they are showing is not even funny at this point. How stupid does one have to be?How does ones spirit fill with so much hatred that all common sense is displaced?At this juncture on time, and on American soil, I believe that we need to be more aware of these "Americans" (and I use the name loosely), than of all other terrorist factions combined.
    I hope this man is wrong...XOXO,Me

    *****

    "Scary New GOP Poll"

    On the heels of health care, a new Harris poll reveals Republican attitudes about Obama: Two-thirds think he's a socialist, 57 percent a Muslim—and 24 percent say "he may be the Antichrist."
    To anyone who thinks the end of the health-care vote means a return to civility, wake up. Obama Derangement Syndrome—pathological hatred of the president posing as patriotism—has infected the Republican Party. Here's new data to prove it:

    67 percent of Republicans (and 40 percent of Americans overall) believe that Obama is a socialist.

    The belief that Obama is a “domestic enemy” is widely held—a sign of trouble yet to come. 57 percent of Republicans (32 percent overall) believe that Obama is a Muslim45 percent of Republicans (25 percent overall) agree with the Birthers in their belief that Obama was "not born in the United States and so is not eligible to be president"38 percent of Republicans (20 percent overall) say that Obama is "doing many of the things that Hitler did"Scariest of all, 24 percent of Republicans (14 percent overall) say that Obama "may be the Antichrist." These numbers all come from a brand-new Harris poll, inspired in part by my new book <a href=

    ReplyDelete

  13. Sweet Suzy,
    A word of advice. Ambien is a nasty nasty drug to take. (Better a glass of wine, I promise).
    But I am glad you got some sleep too.

    XOXO
    me

    ReplyDelete
  14. Admit it, you didn't even read the article, let alone learn anything from any of the links.
    That said, your reply actually makes sense.

    ?

    XOXO
    Me

    ReplyDelete
  15. Sweet RT;
    I believe the research was an awesome task. It takes a lot to even read that many articles, and to separate the bull from the cow.

    XOXO
    Me

    ReplyDelete
  16. "But like Czar Peter content to toil in the shipyards of foreign cities, Queequeg disdained no seeming ignominy, if thereby he might happily gain the power of enlightening his untutored countrymen."
    Moby Dick I-LXVII by Melville, Herman

    ReplyDelete
  17. Sweet Pea;
    Your statement is reason and fact. (I like it).
    We cannot bury our heads in the sand. Not anymore.
    It's getting way too ugly out there.

    XOXO
    Me

    ReplyDelete
  18. My Dear Sweet Kris;Thank you.I really have learned a lot! And wish I had a penny for every word I have read, pro and con. (Then we could BUY Kroll's West). heheheThis past year has taught me so much-
    It has cost me too- Doubtfire, and Connie now too. But I need to also mention that this was their choice.I shall use the comment area here to 'splain what happened 2 days ago...For those that want to know, the message exchange (part of it) between Connie and I went like this:

    _____
    "Maybe I am dense.. maybe I am dough headed.. but I am also terrified and angry... Terrified that this crap that they have passed is going to bankrupt this country... and in the process start killing off people because they are not valued high enough to deserve treatment. and yes that is in the bill.. Angry that the Congress did not listen to the people.. but instead listened to someone promoting socialism or Marxism. maybe you think you are spouting the truth.. but I think you are spouting lies.. Lies that one side of the political realm has fashioned to make gullible people like you defend them. I don't believe either..."Then she wrote this...<br style="font-style: italic;color: rgb(153, 0, 0);font-family: l

    ReplyDelete
  19. Sweet Zusiqu;
    I missed your comment- Sorry...
    I see I actually got it confused with RT's... I am such a dunce sometimes.
    Maybe not enough caffeine...

    I always told my children that if they were thinking of doing something with the hope they wouldn't get caught, that it was quite probably the wrong thing to be doing.
    When all else fails to ask themselves "what would Grandma feel if she found out?"
    Not sure if it worked, but I believe the only one in trouble with the law was 26 before she was arrested. (Of course it had nothing to do with hate either).


    XOXO
    Me

    ReplyDelete